Development of a Digital-Preneurship Measurement Instrument: Alignment Approach Through Project-Based Learning
The purposes of this research are (a) to make an instrument to measure the achievement of project-based digitalpreneurship learning in students; (b) t.
- Pub. date: February 15, 2023
- Pages: 283-295
- 222 Downloads
- 338 Views
- 0 Citations
The purposes of this research are (a) to make an instrument to measure the achievement of project-based digitalpreneurship learning in students; (b) to describe the quality of the project-based digitalpreneurship learning achievement assessment instrument for vocational high school students; (c) to measure the competence and skills. This study employed to research and development as its methodology, using a combination procedure between Oriondo and Antonio and, Mardapi. The development procedure includes three stages: instrument design, instrument testing, and measurement. A total of 795 students who participated in the study at 5 vocational high schools in Yogyakarta's special region served as responders. Data analysis in this development uses the content validity of the formula Aiken V Index, confirmatory factor analysis establishes the construct's validity, and construct reliability. Measurement instrument development. Research findings that (a) the instrument is ready to be used in the measurement; (b) the quality of the project-based digitalpreneruship learning achievement assessment instrument for vocational high school students is well tested. This is evidenced by the validity test which has a high score >.8; The proof of construct validity in this study using CFA > .5; GOF chi-square value with a critical value of df = 289, X2 = 323, p-value with a critical value of .079, RMSEA with a critical value of RMSEA .019 (≤ .08), SMRM with a critical value of SRMR 0.030 (≤ .05), CFI with a critical value of CFI .990 (> .97), and an NFI with a critical value of NFI .989 ( > .90); (c) the measurement results are identified in the process that needs to be improved again regarding the digitalpreneurship skills of vocational high school students.
Keywords: Approach, digitalpreneurship, instrument development, PjBL, vocational student.
References
Abdul Raof, S., & Musta’amal, A. H. (2021). Validity and reliability of instrument competencies framework of agriculture educators: The Rasch measurement model. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 411–420. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.411
Abdurrahman, I. S., Mahmudah, F. N., Santosa, A. B., Paryono, Saryadi, & Cahyono, S. M. (2023). Collaborative online learning: implementation of vocational alignment in accordance with industry’s needs. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 29(1), 23–33. https://bit.ly/3E3X0N1
Ahmadi, R. D. (2022). Strategi lulusan SMK menjadi wirausaha wirausaha otomotif [Strategies for high school graduates to become automotive entrepreneurs]. Evaluasi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.32478/evaluasi.v6i1.918
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Anghel, E., Ludlow, L., Szendey, O., Matz-Costa, C., O’Keefe, T., & Braun, H. (2021). Measuring purpose in life in college students: An assessment of invariance properties by college year and undergraduate school. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.4.603
Asunka, G., Widjajanta, B., & Lisnawati. (2017). Meningkatkan minat wirausaha siswa smk untuk mengurangi kemiskinan dengan perceived desirability dan feasibility [Increasing the entrepreneurial interest of vocational students to reduce poverty with perceived desirability and feasibility]. Strategic: Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Bisnis, 17(2), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.17509/strategic.v17i2.17540
Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. (2020). Developing an instructional design for the field of ICT and software for gifted and talented students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.161
Baig, U., Hussain, B. M., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., & Davidavicius, S. (2022). Digital entrepreneurship: future research directions and opportunities for new business model. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5004. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095004
Basri, I. Y., Faiza, D., Nasir, M., & Nasrun, N. (2019). Implementasi pembelajaran berbasis produk dalam rangka menyiapkan lulusan SMK menjadi wirausahawan muda [Implementation of product-based learning in order to prepare SMK graduates to become young entrepreneurs]. INVOTEK: Jurnal Inovasi Vokasional Dan Teknologi, 19(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.24036/invotek.v19i1.433
Bodzin, A., Hammond, T., Fu, Q., & Farina, W. (2020). Development of instruments to assess students’ spatial learning attitudes (SLA) and interest in science, technology and geospatial technology (STEM-GEO). International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.67
Cahyono, S. M., Kartawagiran, B., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2021). Construct exploration of teacher readiness as an assessor of vocational high school competency test. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1471–1485. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.3.1471
Dong, J. Q. (2019). Moving a mountain with a teaspoon: Toward a theory of digital entrepreneurship in the regulatory environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146(4), 923–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.050
Genoveva, Arquisola, M. J., Srianisha, C. M., & Widiputra, A. W. P. (2019). Entrepreneurship education in SMK Amanah Bangsa, Cikarang: ‘Starting-Up a business is not that hard’. Academics in Action Journal, 1(2), 101–108. https:/doi.org/10.33021/aia.v1i2.916
Giones, F., & Brem, A. (2017). Digital technology entrepreneurship: A definition and research agenda. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(5), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1076
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
Kerlinger, F. N., & Pedhazur, E. J. (1987). Korelasi dan analisis regresi ganda [Correlation and multiple regression analysis] (A. Taufiq, Trans.). Nur Cahaya.
Kolvereid, L., & Moen, Ø. (1997). Entrepreneurship among business graduates: does a major in entrepreneurship make a difference? Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(4), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599710171404
Li, Z., & Li, B. (2021). Measuring thinking styles of pre-service and early career teachers: validation of a revised inventory. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.421
Lysaght, Z., O’Leary, M., & Ludlow, L. (2017). Measuring teachers’ assessment for learning (AfL) classroom practices in elementary schools. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 3(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.3.2.103
Mahlambi, S. B. (2021). Assessment for learning as a driver for active learning and learner participation in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.3.473
Mahmudah, F. N., Baswedan, A. A.-G. R., Usman, H., Mardapi, D., & S Putra, E. C. S. (2022). The importance of partnership management to improve school-to-work transition readiness among vocational high school graduates. Education and Science, 24(5), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-5-64-89 [In Russian]
Mardapi, D. (2008). Teknik penyusunan instrumen tes dan nontes [Techniques for preparing test and nontes instruments]. Mitra Cendekia Pres.
Mardapi, D., & Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Pengembangan instrumen pengukur hasil belajar nirbias dan terskala baku [Development of instruments to measure learning outcomes without bias and on a standard scale]. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 15(2), 326–341. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v15i2.1100
Martinez Dy, A., Martin, L., & Marlow, S. (2018). Emancipation through digital entrepreneurship? A critical realist analysis. Organization, 25(5), 585–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418777891
Mir, A. A., Hassan, S., & Khan, S. J. (2022). Understanding digital entrepreneurial intentions: A capital theory perspective. International Journal of Emerging Markets. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2021-0687
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
Nofrida, E. R., Slamet, P. H., Prasojo, L. D., & Mahmudah, F. N. (2022). The development of an instrument to measure the college student entrepreneurship skills. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.26
Oriondo, L. L, & Dallo-Antonio, E. M. (1984). Evaluating educational outcomes: Tests, measurement and evaluation. Rex Book Store. http://bit.ly/3YywTFZ
Qiao, X., & Hua, J.-H. (2019). Effect of college students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy on entrepreneurial intention: Career adaptability as a mediating variable. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.3.305
Plop, T., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2007). An introduction to educational design research. SLO Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development. https://bit.ly/3EaYF3j
Recker, J., & von Briel, F. (2019). The future of digital entrepreneurship research: Existing and emerging opportunities professional development workshop. In H. Krcmar & J. Fedorowicz (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems, (pp. 1–9). Association for Information Systems. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2019/pdws/pdws/5/
Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship: A theory-based systematization of core performance indicators. Sustainability, 12(10) Article 4018. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104018
Sontay, G., Yetim, H., Karamustafaoglu, S., & Karamustafaoglu, O. (2019). Developing an entrepreneurship scale for 5th grade students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.2.203
Subarkah, E., Kartowagiran, B., Sumarno, Hamdi, S., & Rahim, A. (2022). The development of life skill education evaluation model at life skill training centre. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.2.363
Susantini, E., Kartowagiran, B., Hamdi, S., Hadi, S., Jaedun, A., Gede Astra Wesnawa, I., Sunendar, D., & Laliyo, L. A. R. (2022). Developing competency evaluation of pre-service science teachers in industrial revolution 4.0: Revealing pedagogic and professional competencies. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.2.347
Tariq, M., Arif, H., & Kumar, R. (2015). Issues and challenges for young graduates in becoming entrepreneurs: Economic and personality based perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Research & Psychology, 3(3), 79–85.
Toit, M. du, & Toit, S. du. (1939). Interactive LISREL: User’s guide (Issue 1). Scientific Software International, Inc.
Vasiliadis, A., & Poulios, T. (2007). Entrepreneurship among graduates: Reality and prospects in tertiary education. In Allied Academies International Conference (pp. 75–84). University of Thessaly.
Young, R. Davis, E. Kaveh & Wahlberg, L. (2020). Towards a theory of digital entrepreneurship mindset: the role of digital learning and digital literacy. In B. Anderson, J. Thatcher, & R. Meservy (Eds.), AMCIS 2020 Proceedings (pp. 1–11). Association for Information Systems. http://bit.ly/3YuPVx2