Lecturers’ Experiences of Administering Online Examinations at a South African Open Distance e-Learning University During the COVID-19
South Africa, like other countries in the world, went into lockdown due to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which meant closure of venue-based exam .
- Pub. date: May 15, 2022
- Pages: 275-283
- 356 Downloads
- 462 Views
- 11 Citations
South Africa, like other countries in the world, went into lockdown due to the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) which meant closure of venue-based exam centres, university libraries and academic offices for more than three months. This encounter forced higher institutions of learning to review and reconfigure their assessment practices and conduct alternative assessment practises like timed exams, take home exams, randomised multiple-choice examinations and an online portfolio. Over and above that South Africa experienced load shedding (interruptions to electricity supply) and connectivity challenges which impacted the online examinations. This paper explores the experiences of lecturers whilst administering online examination at a South African Open Distance e-Learning university during COVID-19. Data collected from the lecturers who administered online examination through semi-structured interviews. Thematic analyses were used to analyse the data. Lecturers reported on student challenges related to time allocation, exam security, internet connectivity and data access, digital incompetency and support received from the information communication technology (ICT) department. Academics’ reflection suggests that the system and students were not fully prepared and ready to write the online examination. The researchers propose continued technical and technological education and support for academics and students. Therefore, in line with these experiences, it is important to conduct further the research.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, digital divide, digital skills, lecturers’ views, online examination.
References
Asha, S., & Chellappan, C. (2008). Authentication of e-learners using multimodal biometric technology. In 2008 International Symposium on Biometrics and Security Technologies (pp. 1-6). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISBAST.2008.4547640
Atay, B., & Sumuer, E. (2021). College students’ readiness for connectivist learning: The development and validation of a scale. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(2), 30-242 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2019-0124
Baque, P. G. C., Cevallos, M. M., Natasha, Z. B. M., & Lino, M. B. (2020). The contribution of connectivism in learning by competencies to improve meaningful learning. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 7(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v7n6.1002
Beckers, J., & Merrienboer, J. G. (2018). Walking the tightrope with an e-portfolio: Imbalance between support and autonomy hampers self-directed learning. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 71(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1481448
Bouzeghala, Y. (2020). Investigating the effects of electronic portfolio assessment usage in enhancing learners’ essays writing: The case of third year students of English at Biskra University (Master’s thesis, Biskra University). University of Biskra Repository. https://bit.ly/3wa21P7
Denscombe, M. (2010). The good research guide for small scale research projects (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Harun, R., Hanif, M. H., & Choo, G. S. (2021). The pedagogical affordances of e-portfolio in learning how to teach: A Systematic review. Journal of Studies in English Language and Education, 8(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i1.17876
Heidon, M., & Arnold, O. (2021). Toward process variability management in online examination process in German universities: A state of the art. In C. Koschtial, T Köhler & C Felden (Eds.), e-Science: Open, social and virtual technology for research collaboration (pp. 111-130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66262-2_8
Henaku, E. A. (2020). COVID-19: Online learning experience of college students: The case of Ghana. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Advanced Technology, 1(2), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.31681/JETOL.726441
Kiger, M., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide no. 131. Journal of Medical Teacher, 42(8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030
Laster, J., Cho, Y., & Lochmiller, C. R. (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. Journal of Human Resource Development, 19(1), 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320903890
Makgato, M. (2014). The challenges of teaching and learning technology subject at schools in South Africa: A case of INSET teachers in Mpumalanga Province. Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 116, 3688-3692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.824
Olstad, H. A. (2020). e-Portfolio introduction: Designing a support process. In K. Kori & M. Laanpere (Eds.), International Conference on Informatics in School: Situation, Evaluation and Perspectives (pp. 209-220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_17
Onyema, M., Eucheria, N. C., Obafemi, F. A., Sen, S., Atonye, F. G., Sharma, A., & Asayed, A. O. (2020). Impact of Coronavirus Pandemic on Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 11(13), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-13-12
Pagram, J., Cooper, M., Jin, H., & Campbell, A. (2018). Tales from the exam room: Trialling an e-exam system for computer education and design and technology students. Journal of Education Science, 8(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci8040188
Phuthela, N., & Dwivedi, S. (2020). A qualitative study of students’ perspective on e- learning adoption in India. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12(4), 545559. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2019-0041
Rehman, A., Akhtar, S., & Anwar, U. (2021). online examination system in the times of COVID-19: A case study of Pakistan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary, 6(2), 71-79. https://doi.org/10.31305/rrijm.2021.v06.i02.013
Rose, J., & Johnson, C. W. (2020). Contextualizing reliability and validity in qualitative research: Toward more rigorous and trustworthy qualitative social science in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research,51(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2020.1722042
Schroder, S., Shogren, M., & Terras, K. (2020). Student connectivity in online programs: Role of the nurse faculty. Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 16(10), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.005
Sirghea, A. (2020). Is connectivism a better approach to digital age? In I. Liliya (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference Digital Age: Traditions, Modernity and Innovations (ICDATMI 2020) (pp. 151-155). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201212.033
Smith, B. E. (2019). Mediational modalities: Adolescents collaboratively interpreting literature through digital multimodal composing. Journal of Research in the Teaching of English, 53(3), 197-222.
Van Dijk, J. A. (2017). Digital divide: Impact of access. In P. Rössler, C.A. Hoffner, & L. van Zoonen (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of media effects (1st ed., pp.1-11). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0043
Yu, X., Wang, C. X., & Spector, J. M. (2020). Factors that impact social networking in online self-regulated learning activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(6), 3077-3095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09843-9
Zafiropoulou, B., & Darra, M. (2019). Contribution of the e-portfolio to the improvement of students' performance: Results from a pilot survey in the second grade of primary school in Greece. International Education Studies, 12(7), 119-128. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n7p119