Anghel, B., & Balart, P. (2017). Non-cognitive skills and individual earnings: New evidence from PIAAC. Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, 8(1), 417–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-017-0165-x

Balart, P., & Oosterveen, M. (2019). Females show more sustained performance during test-taking than males. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3798. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11691-y

Bekalo, D. B. (2019). Modeling determinants of time-to-circumcision of girls: a comparison of various parametric shared frailty models. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 19, 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-019-00199-z

Chernick, M. R., & Friis, R. H. (2003). Introductory biostatistics for the health sciences: Modern application including bootstrap. John Wiley and Sons.

Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life‐tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 34(2), 187‐220. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2985181

De Boeck, P., & Jeon, M. (2019). An overview of models for response times and processes in cognitive tests. Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 10, 102. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00102

Dhoke, A., Kumar, A., & Ghosh, I. (2021). Hazard-based duration approach to pedestrian crossing behavior at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211003102

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.,

Finn, B. (2015). Measuring motivation in low-stakes assessments (Research Report No. RR-15-19). Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12067  

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression. SAGE.

Goldhammer, F., Martens, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2017). Conditioning factors of test-taking engagement in PIAAC: An exploratory IRT modelling approach considering person and item characteristics. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 5(18), 1-25. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s40536-017-0051-9

Goldhammer, F., Naumann, J., Stelter, A., Toth, K., Rölke, H., & Klieme, E. (2014). The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034716

Hart, T., Chaparro, B., & Halcomb, C. (2008). Evaluating websites for older adults: Adherence to senior-friendly guidelines and end-user performance. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(3), 191–199, https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290600802031

Harvey, P. D., Tibiriçá, L., Kallestrup, P., & Czaja, S. J. (2020). A Computerized functional skills assessment and training program targeting technology based everyday functional skills. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 156, 1-18, https://doi.org/10.3791/60330

Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8(150), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150

Ilgun Dibek, M. (2020). Silent predictors of test disengagement in PIAAC 2012. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 11(4), 430-450. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.796626

Kirsch, I. S., Lennon, M. L., von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E. J., & Yamamoto, K. (2013). On the growing importance of international large-scale assessments, in the role of international large-scale assessments: Perspectives from technology, economy, and educational research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4629- 9_1

Kleinbaum, D. G., & Klein, M. (2005). Survival analysis: A self-learning text. Springer.

Kureková, L., Haita, C., & Beblavý, M. (2013). Conceptualizing low-skillness: A new approach. Sociology, 45(3), 247-266.

Massing, N., & Schneider, S. L. (2017). Degrees of competency: The relationship between educational qualifications and adult skills across countries. Large-scale Assessment in Education, 5(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-017-0041-y

Nardi, M., & Schemper, M. (2003). Comparing Cox and parametric models in clinical studies. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 3597-3610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1592

Novikov, N. A., Nurislamova, Y. M., Zhozhikashvili, N. A., Kalenkovich, E. E., Lapina, A. A., & Chernishev, B. V. (2017). Slow and fast responses: Two mechanisms of trial outcome processing revealed by EEG oscillations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 11, 218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00218

Odo, D. M. (2012). Computer familiarity and test performance on a computer-based cloze ESL reading assessment. Teaching English with Technology, 12(3), 18-35. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1145240

Orbe, J., Ferreira, E., & Nunez-Anton, V. (2002). Comparing proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models for survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 3493-3510. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1251

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013a). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013b). Skilled for life? Key findings from the survey of adult skills, OECD Publishing. https://bit.ly/2YxcaIN

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013c). PISA 2012 Results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (Volume III), PISA. OECD Publishing. https://bit.ly/3Fwyljo

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Adults, computers and problem solving: What’s the problem? OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236844-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019a). Beyond Proficiency: Using log files to understand respondent behaviour in the survey of adult skills, OECD Skills Studies, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0b1414ed-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019b). Technical report of the survey of adult skills (PIAAC), OECD Publishing. https://bit.ly/2YzyfGU

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019c). The survey of adult skills: Reader’s companion (3rd ed.). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f70238c7-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/69096873-en

O’Neil, H. F., Sugrue, B., & Baker, E. L. (1995). Effects of motivational interventions on the national assessment of educational progress mathematics performance. Educational Assessment, 3(2), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0302_2

Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D. (2002). The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402062002009

Qiao, Y., Labi, S., & Fricker, J. D. (2019). Hazard-based duration models for predicting actual duration of highway projects using nonparametric and parametric survival analysis. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(6), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000700

Qui, J. (2009). Comparison of proportional hazards and accelerated failure time models [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Saskatchewan.

Quinn, D. M., & Cooc, N. (2015). Science achievement gaps by gender and race/ethnicity in elementary and middle school trends and predictors. Educational Researcher, 44(6), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15598539

Ranger, J., Kuhn, J. T., & Ortner, T. M. (2020). Modeling responses and response times in tests with the hierarchical model and the three-parameter lognormal distribution. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 80(6), 1059–1089. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420908916

Ranger, J., & Ortner, T. (2012). A latent trait model for response times on tests employing the proportional hazards model. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 65(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2011.02032.x

Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., Gomez, P., & McKoon, G. (2004). A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging in the lexical-decision task. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.278

Reder, S. (1998). In MC. Smith (Ed.). Literacy for the 21st century: Research, policy, practice and the National Adult Literacy Survey. Greenwood Press.

Rouder, J., Province, J., Morey, R., Gomez, P., & Heathkote, A. (2015). The lognormal race: a cognitive- process model of choice and latency with desirable psychometric properties. Psychometrika, 80(2), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-013-9396-3

Sahin, F., & Colvin, K. F. (2020). Enhancing response time thresholds with response behaviors for detecting disengaged examinees. Large-scale Assessment in Education, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00082-1

Saikia, R., & Barman, M. P. (2017). A review on accelerated failure time models. International Journal of Statistics and Systems, 12(2), 311-322. https://bit.ly/3Btzw0o

Sawaki, Y. (2001). Comparability of conventional and computerized tests of reading in a second language. Language Learning & Technology, 5(2), 38-59. http://dx.doi.org/10125/25127

Scheuermann, F., & Bjornsson, J. (Eds.). (2009). The transition to computer-based assessment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

Schnipke, D. L., & Scrams, D. J. (1997). Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34(3), 213-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1997.tb00516.x

Singh, R., & Mukhopadhyay, K. (2011). Survival analysis in clinical trials: Basics and must know areas. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(4), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.86872

Smith, M. C., Rose, A. D., Ross-Gordon, J., & Smith, T. J. (2015). Adults’ readiness to learn as a predictor of literacy skills. https://bit.ly/3lnVlc9

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ. A triarchic theory of human intelligence. University Press.

Swindell, W. R. (2009). Accelerated failure time models provide a useful statistical framework for aging research. Experimental gerontology, 44(3), 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2008.10.005

van der Linden, W. J. (2007). A hierarchical framework for modeling speed and accuracy on test items. Psychometrika, 72(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-006-1478-z

van der Maas, H. L. J., Molenaar, D., Maris, G., Kievit, R., & Borsboom, D. (2011). Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: On the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences. Psychological Review, 118(2). 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022749  

van Zandt, T. (2002). Analysis of response time distributions. In H. Pashler & J. Wixted (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Methodology in experimental psychology (pp. 461–516). John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Wang, C., Fan, Z., Chang, H. H., & Douglas, J. A. (2013). The linear transformation model with frailties for the analysis of item response times. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 144–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012. 02045.x

Wang, S., & Chen, Y. (2020). Using response times and response accuracy to measure fluency within cognitive diagnosis models. Psychometrika, 85(3), 600–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-020-09717-2

Weakliem, D. L. (1999). A critique of the Bayesian information criterion for model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 27(3), 359–397.

Wei, L. J. (1992). The accelerated failure time model: A useful alternative to the Cox regression model in survival analysis, Statistics in Medicine, 11(14-15), 1871-1879. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111409

Wenger, M., & Gibson, B. (2004). Using hazard functions to assess changes in processing capacity in an attentional cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30(4), 708–719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.708

Wheatley-Price, P., Hutton, B., & Clemons, M. (2012). The Mayan Doomsday’s effect on survival outcomes in clinical trials. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(18), 2021–2022. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121616

Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Low examinee effort in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1

Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2010). Examinee noneffort and the validity of program assessment results. Educational Assessment, 15(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627191003673216

Wise, S. L., & Kong, X. J. (2005). Response time effort: A new measure of examinee motivation in computer-based tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 18(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1802_2