logo logo International Journal of Educational Methodology

IJEM is a leading, peer-reviewed, open access, research journal that provides an online forum for studies in education, by and for scholars and practitioners, worldwide.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

RHAPSODE LTD
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, UK. HA4 7AE
RHAPSODE LTD
Headquarters
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, UK. HA4 7AE
revision behaviours writing process keystroke logging

Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English for Academic Purposes Program

Diana Mazgutova

Revision constitutes an important component of the writing process that integrates text interpretation, reflection, and production. Although previous .

R

Revision constitutes an important component of the writing process that integrates text interpretation, reflection, and production. Although previous studies have offered useful insights into the revision behaviour of L2 writers at different levels of proficiency using off-line measures, little is known about the online processes of revision. In this study, I used keystroke logging to investigate longitudinal changes in the revision processes of postgraduate and undergraduate students in the context of an intensive English for Academic Purposes (EAP) program. Twenty-five postgraduate and 14 undergraduate students participated in this study. The keystroke logging program Inputlog was used during two essay writing sessions at the beginning and at the end of the course to observe how the participants revise their essays and to get insights into their on-line writing processes. Keystroke logging data were coded in terms of the orientation and location of revisions. The results revealed that postgraduates produced more content-oriented revisions at the end of the programme than at the beginning. The opposite trend was observed for the undergraduates, who revised their essays significantly less frequently at the end than at the beginning of the EAP program and made more mechanical revisions than postgraduate writers. The findings highlight fundamental differences in the developmental trajectories of revision processes between postgraduate and undergraduate students. These differences caused by previous academic writing experience and language proficiency should be considered in developing materials for EAP programs. In the paper, I also discuss benefits of using keystroke logging to investigate L2 writers’ revision processes.

Keywords: Revision behaviours, writing process, keystroke logging.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
485
Download
701
Citations
Crossref
2

Scopus

References

Barkaoui, K. (2007). Revision in second language writing: What teachers need to know. TESL Canada Journal, 25(1), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v25i1.109

Barkaoui, K. (2016).What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: The roles of task type, second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 320-340. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12316

Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Breuer, E. O. (2017). Revision processes in first language and foreign language writing: Differences and similarities in the success of revision processes. Journal of Academic Writing, 7(1), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v7i1.214

Chanquoy, L. (2009). Revision processes. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of writing development (pp. 80–97). SAGE.

Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088301018001004

Choi, Y. H. (2007). On-line revision behaviors in EFL writing process. English Teaching, 62(4), 69-93.

Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press.

Council of Europe. (2001). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge University Press.

Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 400–414. https://doi.org/10.2307/356602

Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481-506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004481

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and application (pp. 1-55). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369-388.

Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088306286283

Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2006). Inputlog: New perspectives on the logging of on-line writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer key-stroke logging and writing: Methods and applications (Vol. 18, pp. 73-94). Elsevier.

Leijten, M., & Van Waes, L. (2013). Keystroke logging in writing research: Using Inputlog to analyze and visualize writing processes. Written Communication, 30(3), 358-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313491692

Lindgren, E., & Sullivan, K. P. H. (2006). Analyzing online revision. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Studies in writing, Vol. 18, Computer keystroke logging and writing (pp. 157-188). Elsevier.

Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing. Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts. Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102-129). Multilingual Matters.

Michel, M., Révész, A., & Lu, X. (2020). Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research, 36(3), 307-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320915501

Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2007). More than just error correction: Students' perspectives on their revision processes during writing. Written Communication, 24(4), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088307305976

Porte, G. (1996). When writing fails: How academic context and past learning experiences shape revision. System, 24(1), 107–116.

Révész, A., Kourtali N. E., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviours and linguistic complexity. Language Learning 67(1), 208–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12205

Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviours: A mixed-methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 605-631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900024X

 Roca de Larios, J., Marin, J., &Murphy, L. (2001). A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51(3), 497-538.

Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marin, J. (2008). The foreign language writer's strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30-47.

Scardamalia, M, & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 142-175). Cambridge University Press.

 Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3587400

Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 201-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002

Strömqvist, S., Holmqvist, K., Johansson, V., Karlsson, H., & Wengelin, Å. (2006). What keystroke logging can reveal about writing. In K. P. H. Sullivan & E. Lindgren (Eds.), Computer Key-stroke Logging and Writing: Methods and Applications (pp. 45-71). Elsevier.

Thorson, H. (2000). Using the computer to compare foreign and native language writing processes: A statistical and case study approach. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 155-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00059

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process of discovering meaning. TESOL Quarterly, 16(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586792

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586647

...