Akpınar, B. (2015). Eğitimde müfredat geliştirme [Curriculum development in education]. Data Publishing.

Arıkan, G., Karataş, T., & Kavcar, N. (2017). Fizik öğretmenlerinin 12. sınıf fizik kitabına ilişkin görüşleri: İzmir ili örneği [ Opinions of physics teachers on 12th-grade physics book: The case of İzmir province]. Ondokuz Mayis University Journal of Education Faculty/ Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 19-43. http://bit.ly/3E24mQT  

Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Bebek, G. (2018). Fizik öğretimi sürecinde yaşanan sorunların değerlendirilmesine yönelik bir çalışma [A study on the evaluation of the problems experienced in the physics teaching process]. Kastamonu Education Journal/ Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(1), 125 - 134. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.375680  

Ayvacı, Ş. H., & Devecioğlu, Y. (2006, May 1-3). Yeni program ve öğretmenlerin yenilikçi bakış açıları [New curriculum and innovative perspectives of teachers] [Paper presentation]. The First International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.

Bao, L., & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21st century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8  

Baylor, M.-E., Hoehn, J. R., & Finkelstein, N. (2022). Infusing equity, diversity, and inclusion throughout our physics curriculum: (Re)defining what it means to be a physicist. The Physics Teacher, 60, 172-175. https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0032998

Bayrak, C., & Bezen, S. (2013). 9. sınıf fizik öğretim programında yer alan konuların öğretiminde karşılaşılan sorunlara ve yeni öğretim programına yönelik öğretmen görüşleri [Teacher opinions on the new teaching syllabus and the issues encountered when teaching the subjects of the 9th grade physics syllabus]. H. U. Journal of Education/ Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (Special Issue-1), 27-38. https://bit.ly/3Ipr7Rm

Bilen, M. (2006). Plandan uygulamaya eğitim [Education: From planning to implementation]. Anı Publishing.

Bozdemir, S. (2005). 21. YY. fizik/fen eğitimi/öğretimi nasıl olmalı [How to teach physics/science education/teaching in the 21st-century]. SILO.TIPS. http://bit.ly/3jTigy0

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search for understanding the case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bugingo, J. B., Yadav, L. L., Mugisha, I. S., & Mashood, K. K. (2022). Improving teachers’ and students’ views on nature of science through active instructional approaches: A Review of the literature. Science & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00382-8

Büyükkaragöz, S. (1997). Program geliştirme-kaynak ve metinler [Program development-sources and texts]. Kuzucular Ofset.

Caramaschi, M., Cullinane, A., Levrini, O., & Erduran, S. (2022). Mapping the nature of science in the Italian physics curriculum: from missing links to opportunities for reform. International Journal of Science Education, 44(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2017061

Cooperstein, S. E., & Kocevar-Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond active learning: A constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 141-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907320410537658

Development Agencies. (n.d.). Kalkınma planlamasında istatistiki bölge birimleri sınıflandırması [Classification of statistical regional units in development planning]. https://bit.ly/3InTYpm

Dicle Erdamar, I. Y. (2019). Lise fizik dersi öğretim programının program geliştirme bağlamında analizi [Analysis of high school physics course curriculum in the context of curriculum development]. Harran Education Journal/ Harran Maarif Dergisi, 4(2), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.22596/2019.0402.29.44

Dillon, J., Morris, M., O’Donnell, L., Reid, A., Scott, W., & Rickinson, M. (2006). Education! Education! Beyond the classroom. Primary Science Review, 91, 4–6.

Eke, C. (2018). Ortaöğretim fizik dersi öğretim programındaki kazanımların yenilenmiş Bloom taksonomisine göre analizi [Analysis of the achievements in the secondary school physics curriculum according to the revised Bloom's taxonomy]. Sosyal Araştırmalar ve Davranış Bilimleri, 4(6), 69-84. http://bit.ly/3YKjlqM

Elby, A. (1999). Another reason that physics students learn by rote. American Journal of Physics, 67, Article S52. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.19081

Fernandez, T., Ritchie, G., & Barker, M. (2008). A sociocultural analysis of mandated curriculum change: The implementation of a new senior physics curriculum in New Zealand schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(2), 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270701313978

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Mac Graw Hill, Inc.

Fu, G., & Clarke, A. (2019). Individual and collective agencies in China's curriculum reform: A case of physics teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21467

Göçen, G., & Kabaran, H.  (2013). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf  fizik  dersi  öğretim  programlarının tarihsel    süreç içerisinde    karşılaştırmalı    olarak İncelenmesi    [A    comparative investigation    of    physics    teaching    programs    in    the    historical    processs]. Journal of Science Teaching/ Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 1(2), 147-157. https://bit.ly/3HZhCHt

Hansson, L., Hansson, Ö., Juter, K., & Redfors, A. (2021). Curriculum emphases, mathematics and teaching practices: Swedish upper-secondary physics teachers’ views. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 499-515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10078-6

Hauenstein, A. D. (1975). Curriculum planning for behavioral development. Charles A. Jones.

Honebein, P. C., & Sink, D. L. (2012). The practice of eclectic instructional design. Performance Improvement, 51(10), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21312

Jayawardana, C., Hewagamage, K. P., & Hirakawa, M. (2001). Personalization tools for active learning in digital libraries. The Journal of Academic Media Librarianship, 8(1). https://bit.ly/3E2zwIc

Kablan, Z. (2014). Hedef belirleme: Bilişsel, duyuşsal ve devinişsel alanlar. Eğitimde program geliştirme kavramlar yaklaşımlar [Goal setting: Cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. Curriculum development in education concepts approaches]. Anı Publishing.

Kavcar, N., & Erdem, A. (2017). Fizik öğretim programları ile fizik ders kitaplarının proje tabanlı öğrenme açısından incelenmesi [Examination of physics curriculum and physics textbooks in terms of project-based learning]. Online Science Education Journal/ Online Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 2(1), 11-44. http://bit.ly/3YxXTFK

Kotluk, N., & Yayla, A. (2016). Ortaöğretim 9. sınıf fizik öğretim programının Tyler'ın hedefe dayalı değerlendirme modelin göre değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of secondary school 9th-grade physics curriculum according to Tyler's goal-based assessment model]. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(4), 1832-1852. http://bit.ly/3K1RmyJ

Koyuncu, K., & Kavcar, N. (2016). Öğretmenlerin 2007 fizik programına ve uygulamalarına yonelik goruşlerine kişisel ozelliklerinin etkisi [The effect of personal traits on teachers' views on the 2007 physics curriculum and its applications]. Amasya Education Journal/ Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,5(2), 373-418. http://bit.ly/3ImldR3

Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-facet: Rasch measurement. MESA Press.

Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

Menon, D., Chandrasekhar, M., Kosztin, D., & Steinhof, D. C. (2020). Impact of mobile technology-based physics curriculum on preservice elementary teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Science Education, 104(2), 252-289. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21554

Ministry of National Education. (2005). Ministry of education. science and technology curriculum. Milli Eğitim Yayınevi.

Ministry of National Education. (2018). Ortaöğretim fizik dersi (9. 10. 11. ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı [Secondary education physics course (9^th, 10^th, 11^th, and 12^th grades) curriculum]. http://bit.ly/3k006L5

Nalçacı, İ. Ö., Akarsu, B., & Kariper, İ. A. (2011). Orta öğretim öğrencileri için fizik tutum ölçeği derlenmesi ve öğrenci tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi [Compilation of physics attitude scale for secondary school students and evaluation of student attitudes]. Journal of European Education, 1(1), 1-6. https://bit.ly/3E7mLMx

National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. The National Academies Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11625.html

Nowak, A. T., Feyereisen, K., & Fiorino, A. J. (1970). Supervision and curriculum renewal: A systems approach. Appleton- Century- Crofts.

Orlich, D. C., Harder, J. R., Callahan, J. R., & Gibson, H. W. (1998). Teaching strategies: a guide to better instruction. Houghton Mifflin Company

Posner, G. J. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. McGraw-Hill Humanities Social.

Saylor, J. G., Alexander, W. M., & Lewis, A. J. (1981). Curriculum planning for better teaching and learning. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Serway, A. R. (1995). Physics for scientists and engineers. Palme Publishing

Sönmez, V. (2015). Örnekleriyle eğitimde program değerlendirme [Program evaluation in education with examples]. Anı Publishing.

Stadermann, H. K. E. (2022). Connecting secondary school quantum physics and nature of science: Possibilities and challenges in curriculum design, teaching, and learning [Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen]. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.195942915

Stadermann, H. K. E., Van Den Berg, E., & Goedhart, M. J. (2019). Analysis of secondary school quantum physics curricula of 15 different countries: Different perspectives on a challenging topic. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15, Article 010130. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010130

Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik [In social and behavioral measures validity and reliability].  Seçkin Publishing.

Thompson, S., & Gregg, L. (1997). Reculturing middle schools for meaningful change. Middle School Journal, 28(5), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1997.11494471

Van De Heyde, V., & Siebrits, A. (2019). Students’ attitudes towards online pre-laboratory exercises for a physics extended curriculum programme. Research in Science and Technological Education, 37(2), 168–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2018.1493448

Varış, F. (1996). Eğitimde program geliştirme- teori, teknikler [Curriculum development in education- theory, techniques]. Alkım Publishing.

Veneziano, L., & Hooper, J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21(1), 67-70.

Yurdugül, H., & Aşkar, P. (2008). Öğrencilerin teknolojiye yönelik tutum ölçeği faktör yapılarının incelenmesi: Türkiye örneği [Examination of the factor structures of students' attitude scale towards technology: The case of Turkey]. Elementary Education Online/ İlköğretim Online, 7(2), 288-309. http://bit.ly/3HZhCHt