Involvement of Stakeholders in the Transformation of Educational Services via Taking Advantage of Extra-Curriculum Educational Activities in the Settings of Education Reform
Valentyna I. Bobrytska
,
Hanna V. Krasylnykova
,
Nataliia V. Ladohubets
,
Larysa I. Vorona
,
Illia О. Lysokon
The purpose of the study is to explore the ways of involving university stakeholders specifically in updating educational services. It combined explor.
- Pub. date: February 15, 2023
- Pages: 107-122
- 396 Downloads
- 1056 Views
- 4 Citations
The purpose of the study is to explore the ways of involving university stakeholders specifically in updating educational services. It combined exploratory and observational research methods which relied on qualitative or quantitative data gathered through the researcher-designed and validated tools which were the empirical and methodological contributions to the previous research. The five most frequent choices that might encourage the stakeholders to donate or invest in an educational institution were as follows: a portfolio of the use of donations, investments, or grants, having a stake in the educational services of more than 7%, having access to budgeting and cost reporting, having a share in the institutions’ profit and being one of the decision-makers. The factors that discouraged investors from investing in education were as follows: distrust of the activity of the educational institutions in terms of addressing the stakeholders’ needs or interests, lack of engagement or cooperation, institutional and government-imposed barriers between them and the institutions, uncertainty concerning the efficiency of the institutions and inefficient use of the resources by the institutions. The initiative was complimentarily perceived by stakeholders in terms of collaboration and investment opportunities. It was also found beneficial by the sampled students.
education extra curriculum educational services involvement of stakeholders investments in education transformation of educational services
Keywords: Education, extra-curriculum educational services, involvement of stakeholders, investments in education, transformation of educational services.
References
Ansell, K. (2021, May 18). Understanding and engaging stakeholders in higher education – the Board’s role. Advance HE. http://bitly.ws/yM8k
Beerkens, M., & Udam, M. (2017). Stakeholders in higher education quality assurance: Richness in diversity? Higher Education Policy, 30, 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-016-0032-6
Bobrytska, V., Luzik, E., Reva, T., Spitsin, Y., & Akmaldinova, V. (2020). Involving stakeholders in shaping educational legislation and policy in Ukraine. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(3), 1189-1200. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.3.1189
Bobrytska, V. I., Krasylnykova, H. V., Batechko, N. G., Beseda, N. А., & Spitsyn, Y. S. (2020). Reshaping the university curriculum through the visiting lectureship. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(12), 70-85, https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.12.4
Cabardo, J. R. O. (2016). Levels of participation of the school stakeholders to the different school-initiated activities and the implementation of school-based management. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 8(1), 81-94. http://bitly.ws/yMdW
Chapleo, C., & Simms, C. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education: A case study of the University of Portsmouth. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 14(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603100903458034
Crammond, R. J. (2020). The entrepreneurship education stakeholder within universities. In R. J. Crammond (Ed.), Advancing entrepreneurship education in universities (pp. 123-154). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35191-5_5
de Freitas Langrafe, T., Barakat, S. R., Stocker, F., & Boaventura, J. (2020). A stakeholder theory approach to creating value in higher education institutions. The Bottom Line, 33(4), 297-313. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-03-2020-0021
Drew, C. (2022, December 6). 15 top stakeholders in education. Helpful Professor. http://bitly.ws/yvqI
Dunn, W. (2014). Six best practices in stakeholder engagement. LinkedIn. http://bitly.ws/yMbQ
Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Bellés-Colomer, L. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting in higher education: An analysis of key internal stakeholders’ expectations. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(2), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-06-2016-0116
Formplus Blog. (2020, January 23). Experimental research designs: Types, examples & methods. Formplus. http://bitly.ws/yxBa
Goodwin, D., Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2019). Ethical issues in qualitative research. In N. Mays, & C. Pope (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (4th ed., pp. 27-41). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410867.ch3
International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity. (2016). The learning generation: Investing in education for a changing world. The Education Commission. http://bitly.ws/ueFR
Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical University. (2022). Perelik dodatkovykh osvitnikh ta inshykh posluh, yikh vartistʹ, poryadok nadannya ta oplaty [List of extra-curriculum educational and other services, their price, procedure provision, and payment]. http://bitly.ws/uu6o
Jamovi Project. (2021). Jamovi. (Version 2.2.5) [Computer Software]. https://www.jamovi.org
Janmaat, G., McCowan, T., & Rao, N. (2016). Different stakeholders in education. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 169-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1134956
Johnston, R., Jones, K., & Manley, D. (2018). Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: A cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1957–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6
Kang, B. (2021). How the COVID-19 pandemic is reshaping the education service. In J. Lee & S. H. Han (Eds.), The future of service post-COVID-19 pandemic, Volume 1: The ICT and evolution of work (pp. 15–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4126-5_2
Kettunen, J. (2015). Stakeholder relationships in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 21(1), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13583883.2014.997277
Kozhemyakina, S. N. (2016). Investytsiyi v sferu vyshchoyi osvity Ukrayiny: Neobkhidnistʹ strukturnykh zmin [Investing Ukrainian higher education: The need for structural changes]. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 7, 1-5. http://bitly.ws/yxBp
KROK University. (2022). Perelik dodatkovykh osvitnikh ta inshykh posluh, yikh vartistʹ, poryadok nadannya ta oplaty (u 2022-2023 navchalʹnomu rotsi) [List of extra-curriculum educational and other services, price, provision, and payment procedure (for the academic year of 2022-2023)]. http://bitly.ws/uu4C
Labanauskis, R., & Ginevičius, R. (2017). Role of stakeholders leading to development of higher education services. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 9(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2017-0026
Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Frankenberger, F., Akib, N. A. M., Sen, S. K., Sivapalan, S., Novo-Corti, I., Venkatesan, M., & Emblen-Perry, K. (2021). Governance and sustainable development at higher education institutions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23, 6002–6020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00859-y
Lourenço, R., & Mano, M. (2018). The role of general councils in the supervision of the organizational performance of higher education institutions. International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences, 10.0(10), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1315711
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Mainardes, E., Alves, H., & Raposo, M. (2012). A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861-1879. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648
Niehoff, M. (2020, January 31). To transform education, all stakeholders must transform first. Getting Smart. http://bitly.ws/uezP
Olefirenko, T. O., Bobrytska, V. I., Batechko, N. G., Reva, T. D., & Chkhalo, O. M. (2021). Involving university stakeholders in upgrading the fostering of students’ readiness to embark on a career. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 152-171. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.9
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
RAND Corporation. (2022). Education reform. https://l24.im/alJfi3
Savga, L., Krykliy, O., & Kyrychenko, K. (2018). The role of internal and external stakeholders in higher education system in Ukraine. Business Ethics and Leadership, 2(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.2(1).32-43.2018
Supasitthimethee, U., Waraporn, N., Porkaew, K., & Charoenkitkarn, N. (2017). Stakeholder involvement in teaching and learning. In Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (pp. 1-5). The University of Toronto. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.v0i0.10620
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management, 5(3), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205040
Taysom, S. (2021, February 6). 7 benefits of stakeholder engagement. Keyah Consulting. http://bitly.ws/yxzE
Thomas, L. (2020). Simple random sampling: Definition, steps & examples. Scribbr. http://bitly.ws/yxAR
Tien, N. H. (2018). The role of alumni and employers in improving and assuring the quality of postgraduate and graduate study. In Proceedings of University Scientific Conference on Quality Assurance – Improving Program and Teaching Activities of Graduate and Postgraduate Education (pp. 120-127). University of Social Science and Humanities in HCMC. http://bitly.ws/zs7a [In Vietnamase]
Tkachuk, A. (2021, January 14). Investytsiyi v osvitu chy v asfalʹt? [Invest in education or in asphalt?]. ZN,UA. http://bitly.ws/yxzM
Tolich, M., & Tumilty, E. (2021). Finding our ethical research self: A guidebook for novice qualitative researchers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056994
Topalova, S. (2018, December 17). Reformuvannya vyshchoyi osvity v Ukrayini: Finansove zabezpechennya [Reforming higher education in Ukraine: Financial support]. LB.ua. http://bitly.ws/vn3S
Tovaglieri, F. (n.d.). Invest in education: The best sector is higher education. EHL Insights. Retrieved October 9, 2022, from http://bitly.ws/yxBY
Upwork Team. (2021, March 24). Stakeholder theory: What it is and why you should care. Upwork. http://bitly.ws/yxBJ
Webtools Services. (n.d.). Text analyzer [Web App]. Retrieved October 9, 2022, from http://bitly.ws/yxC7
World Sustainable. (2019, July 13). Inferential statistics examples: A brief explanation. http://bitly.ws/yJc3
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6