logo logo International Journal of Educational Methodology

IJEM is a leading, peer-reviewed, open access, research journal that provides an online forum for studies in education, by and for scholars and practitioners, worldwide.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.


Publisher (HQ)

Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, UK. HA4 7AE
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, UK. HA4 7AE
parents rasch model scientific attitude school committee teachers

Involvement of Teachers, Parents, and School Committees in Improving Scientific Attitudes of Elementary School Students: Application of Rasch Model Analysis

Kartika Chrysti Suryandai , Rokhmaniyah , Moh Salimi , Siti Fatimah

This research analyzed the involvement of teachers, parents, and school committees in improving scientific attitudes in science learning using Rasch m.


This research analyzed the involvement of teachers, parents, and school committees in improving scientific attitudes in science learning using Rasch model analysis. A survey method was used in this quantitative study. Participants in the study were selected using a purposive sample of 174 teachers, parents, and school committees in Sleman and Kebumen Regencies, Indonesia. A questionnaire was used in data collection to determine the involvement of teachers, parents, and school committees in improving scientific attitudes toward science learning. The questionnaires were completed using a Likert scale of 1-4, and the data were then analyzed using the Rasch model. The result showed that all participants were the average logit items (+1.03 logit). The reliability was 0.89, indicating a positive response to improving students' scientific attitudes. The results of the Rasch model analysis suggested that the involvement of parents, teachers, and school committees in improving scientific attitudes differed according to their roles. Each instrument element was analyzed in more detail in the Rasch model. Participants' roles were reflected in the specific involvements of teachers in learning, parents at home with children, and school committees participating in school policy-making.

Keywords: Parents, Rasch model, scientific attitude, school committee, teachers.

cloud_download PDF
Article Metrics



Adams, D., Sumintono, B., Mohamed, A., & Noor, N. S. M. (2018). E-learning readiness among students of diverse backgrounds in a leading Malaysian higher education institution. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(2), 227–256. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2018.15.2.9

Adams, D., Tan, M. H. J., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Students’ readiness for blended learning in a leading Malaysian private higher education institution. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(4), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-03-2020-0032

Ahrari, S., Abu, B., Hassan, B., Wahiza, N., Wahat, A., & Zaremohzzabieh, Z. (2016). Deepening critical thinking skills through civic engagement in Malaysian higher education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 21–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.09.009

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644854 51012

Alan, B. D., & Spero, R. A. (2014). Improving critical thinking skills and metacognitive monitoring through direct infusion. Thinking Skills and Creativity12, 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.001

Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). Literasi sains dan aktivitas siswa pada pembelajaran IPA terpadu tipe shared [Scientific literacy and student activities in shared-type integrated science learning]. Unnes Science Education Journal, 5(1), 1167-1174. https://cutt.ly/CNGggiF

Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Darmaji, & Anggraini, L. (2020). Comparison of students’ attitudes in science subjects in urban and rural areas. Journal of Educational Science and Technology, 6(2), 126-136. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i2.12057

Bağcı, H., İlbay, A. B., & Bağcı, Ö. A. (2014). Examining preschool teachers’ attitudes about the usage of technological tools in education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences152, 143–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.171

Beaumont, J. (2010). A sequence of critical thinking tasks. TESOL Journal, 1(4), 427–448. https://doi.org/10.5054/tj.2010.234763

Berg-Nielsen, T., Solheim, E., Belsky, J., & Wichstrom, L. (2012). Preschoolers’ psycho-social problems: In the eyes of the beholder? Adding teacher characteristics as determinants of discrepant parent-teacher reports. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43, 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-011-0271-0

Birhan, W., Shiferaw, G., Amsalu, A., Tamiru, M., & Tiruye, H. (2021). Exploring the context of teaching character education to children in preprimary and primary schools. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100171

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2012). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Bradley, K., Peabody, M., Akers, K., & Knutson, N. (2015). Rating scales in survey research: Using the Rasch model to illustrate the middle category measurement flaw. Survey Practice, 8(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29115/SP-2015-0001

Brown, M., Blanchard, T., & McGrath, R. E. (2020). Differences in self-reported character strengths across adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.008

Bunujevac, M., & Durisic, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education. CEPS Journal7(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.291

Chan, S. W., Looi, C. K., & Sumintono, B. (2021). Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students: A Rasch model measurement analysis. Journal of Computers in Education, 8(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2

Cheung, C., & Lee, T. (2010). Improving social competence through character education. Evaluation and Program Planning33(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.08.006

Creswell, J., & Clark, P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.

Erdoğan, S. C. (2015). Investigating pre-service gifted education teachers’ self-efficacy toward science teaching and scientific attitudes. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(59), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.59.8

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw-Hill.

Gogoi, M., & Munda, B. (2016). Scientific attitude of secondary school students of Sivasagar district in relation to their achievement in science. International Journal of Innovation Sciences and Research, 5(2), 637-641. https://doi.org/10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00002.2

Gross, D., Fogg, L., Garvey, C., & Julion, W. (2004). Behavior problems in young children: An analysis of cross-informant agreements and disagreements. Research in Nursing and Health, 27, 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20040

Halik, A., Wardah Hanafie Das, S., Aswad, M., Syakir Rady, M., Dangnga, M. S., & Nasir, M. S. (2019). Empowerment of school committee in improving education service quality at public primary school in Pare-Pare city. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9), 1956–1963. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070915

Huang, C. (2017). Cross-informant agreement on the child behavior checklist for youths: A meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 120, 1096–1116. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0033294117717733

Kim, S., Choe, I., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The development and evaluation of the effect of creative problem-solving program on young children’s creativity and character. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, Article 100590 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100590

Koh, J. H. L., & Chai, C. S. (2014). Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Computers and Education70, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017

Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

Ling Lee, W., Chinna, K., & Sumintono, B. (2020). Psychometrics assessment of Heart QoL questionnaire: A Rasch analysis. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 28, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487320902322

Maison, M., Haryanto, H., Ernawati, M. D. W., Ningsih, Y., Jannah, N., Puspitasari, T. O., & Putra, D. S. (2020). Comparison of student attitudes towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education9(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i1.20394

Maison, Syahrial, Syamsurizal, & Tanti. (2019). Learning environment, students’ beliefs, and self-regulation in learning physics: Structural equation modeling. Journal of Baltic Science Education18(3), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.389

Maranan, V. M. (2017). Basic process skills and attitude toward science: Inputs to an enhanced students’ cognitive performance [Master’s thesis, Laguna State Polytechnic University-San Pablo]. University-San Pablo. http://www.sciepub.com/reference/324549

Maryati, Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., & Sumintono, B. (2019). Measuring teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge using many-facet Rasch model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.26598

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016a). Regulation of the minister of national education number 24 concerning core competencies and basic competencies. Ministry of Education and Culture. https://bit.ly/3Vg22g6

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2016b). Regulation of the minister of national education number 75 of 2016 concerning the board of education and school committees. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2117 of 2016. https://bit.ly/3MkAEcM   

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mubarok, H., Akbar, M., & Boeriswati, E. (2021). The impact of perceptions of policy dissemination, communication, and motivation on national character knowledge of primary school teachers. Journal of Educational and Social Research11(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0036

Murphy, C., Bianchi, L., McCullagh, J., & Kerr, K. (2013). Scaling up higher order thinking skills and personal capabilities in primary science: Theory-into-policy-into-practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.06.005

Nugraha, I., Putri, N. K., & Sholihin, H. (2020). An analysis of the relationship between students’ scientific attitude and students’ learning style in junior high school. Journal of Science Learning3(3), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v3i3.22873

Oh, J. Y. (2017). Suggesting a NOS map for nature of science for science education instruction. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1461-1483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00680a

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2021). Research and development (R&D). https://doi.org/10.1787/20ddfb0f-en

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Rescorla, L., Bochicchio, L., Achenbach, T., Ivanova, M. Y., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., Bilenberg, N., Bird, H., Dobrean, A., Erol, N., Fombonne, E., Fonseca, A., Frigerio, A., Fung, D. S. S., Lambert, M. C., Leung, P. W. L., Liu, X., Marković, I., Markovic, J., … Frank C. V. (2014). Parent–teacher agreement on children's problems in 21 societies. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 627-642. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2014.900719

Rosnati, R., Barni, D., & Montirosso, R. (2010). Italian international adoptees at home and at school: A Multi-informant assessment of behavioral problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(6), 783–786. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021758

Sanders, M. G., & Sheldon, S. B. (2009). Principals matter: A guide to school, family, and community partnerships. SAGE.

Santos, G., Farrington, D. P., da Agra, C., & Cardoso, C. S. (2020). Parent-teacher agreement on children’s externalizing behaviors: Results from a community sample of Portuguese elementary-school children. Children and Youth Services Review110(10), Article 104809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104809

Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a

Sari, R. M., Sumarmi, Astina, I. K., Utomo, D. H., & Ridhwan. (2021). Increasing students critical thinking skills and learning motivation using inquiry mind map. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(3), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i03.16515

Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions: A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530-565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423382

Setiawan, B., Panduwangi, M., & Sumintono, B. (2018). A Rasch analysis of the community’s preference for different attributes of Islamic banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Economics, 45(12), 1647–1662. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-07-2017-0294

Shin, H., Park, C. G., & Kim, H. (2015). Validation of Yoon’s critical thinking disposition instrument. Asian Nursing Research, 9(4), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.10.004

Siko, J. P., & Barbour, M. K. (2016). Building a better mousetrap: How design-based research was used to improve homemade PowerPoint games. Technology Trends60(5), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0092-x

Sormunen, K., & Köksal, M. S. (2014). Advanced science students’ understandings on nature of science in Finland. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 167-176. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.3.4.167

Suryandari, K. C., Rokhmaniyah, & Chamdani, M. (2020). Enhancement of artifact based activities learning in natural science through scientific reading based project (SRBP) model for preservice teacher using design based research (DBR). ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3452210

Suryandari, K. C., Rokhmaniyah, & Wahyudi. (2021). The effect of scientific reading-based project model in empowering creative thinking skills of preservice teacher in elementary school. European Journal of Educational Research10(3), 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.10.3.1329

Suryandari, K. C., Sajidan, Rahardjo, S. B., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2017). The beliefs towards science teaching orientation of pre-service teachers in primary teacher education programme. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities25, 169–186. https://bit.ly/3yucYgx   

Stupple, E. J. N., Maratos, F. A., Elander, J., Hunt, T. E., Cheung, K. Y. F., & Aubeeluck, A. V. (2017). Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): A measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.007

Sumintono, B. (2018). Rasch model measurements as tools in assessment for learning. In N. Mariana, F. Arianto, S. Chendra, Wibawa, U. Zuhdi, S. Trihantoyo, B. Dibyo Wiyono, E. Winingsih, M. S. Haq, A. G. Abdullah & A. B. Dani, Nandiyanto (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2017) (pp. 38–42). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icei-17.2018.11

Šteh, B., & Kalin, J. (2011). Building partner cooperation between teachers and parents. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(4), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:6062

Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale development. Research in Higher Education, 58(8), 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0

White, B. Y. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction16(1), 3–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2

Widhiarso, W., & Sumintono, B. (2016). Examining response aberrance as a cause of outliers in statistical analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.099

Wijayanti, M. D., Rahardjo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mulyani, S. (2019). Item analysis of critical thinking skills instrument to measure effectiveness of scientific group inquiry learning (SGIL) model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20794.

Wildayanto, A., Sudarmin, & Nugroho, S. E. (2020). Analysis of science literation and scientific attitudes at temperature and color. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(2), 151-158. https://cutt.ly/xNYVFeF