logo logo International Journal of Educational Methodology

IJEM is a leading, peer-reviewed, open access, research journal that provides an online forum for studies in education, by and for scholars and practitioners, worldwide.

Subscribe to

Receive Email Alerts

for special events, calls for papers, and professional development opportunities.

Subscribe

Publisher (HQ)

RHAPSODE
Eurasian Society of Educational Research
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
RHAPSODE
Headquarters
College House, 2nd Floor 17 King Edwards Road, Ruislip, London, HA4 7AE, UK
Theoretical Article

Living the Viva: The Oral Examination in Practice

Jeffrey McNeill , Francisco Benitez-Capistros , Farid Dahdouh-Guebas , Evelien Deboelpaep , Jean Hugé , Nibedita Mukherjee , Tom Van der Stocken , Karolien Van Puyvelde , Nico Koedam

The viva examination or ‘defence’ is a pivotal moment in a student’s or researcher’s career. It marks the conclusion of one st.


  • Pub. date: November 15, 2024
  • Online Pub. date: October 23, 2024
  • Pages: 629-643
  • 600 Downloads
  • 2415 Views
  • 0 Citations
T

The viva examination or ‘defence’ is a pivotal moment in a student’s or researcher’s career. It marks the conclusion of one stage and the beginning of another, whether during the study period or when competing for research funding. Unlike many other formal assessments, the viva is an oral performance. Its form may strongly depend on the domain of science or knowledge sector, on the university or even on faculty. The rituals of interaction between jurors and candidates may differ in many cultural contexts. Yet, the core elements of the defence are the debate, the use of evidence, and the justification for a statement or opinion delivered orally, are common to all. Accordingly, although a successful defence is about content, it is also about language and attitude. In academic education, there is insufficient preparation for this moment when one is in front of jurors, a commission, and even a wider audience. We draw on our combined experience in our own careers and in their coaching of students to present an analysis of the ‘viva’ process. Our findings may help candidates position themselves in the viva context and offer practical advice on how to prepare, define an attitude, and structure answers and responses in general.

Keywords: Examination commission, jury, public defence, scientific argument, thesis.

cloud_download PDF
Cite
Article Metrics
Views
600
Download
2415
Citations
Crossref
0

References

Alcorn, S. R., & Cheesman, M. J. (2022). Technology-assisted viva voce exams: A novel approach aimed at addressing student anxiety and assessor burden in oral assessment. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 664-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2022.04.009

Bolker, J. (1998). Writing your dissertation in fifteen minutes a day: A guide to starting, revising, and finishing your doctoral thesis. Hanry Holt and Company.

Davis, G., & Engward, H. (2018). In defence of the viva voce: Eighteen candidates' voices. Nurse Education Today, 65, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.038

Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago.

Golding, C. (2017). Advice for writing a thesis (based on what examiners do). Open Review of Educational Research, 4(1), 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23265507.2017.1300862

Hartley, J., & Fox, C. (2004). Assessing the mock viva: The experiences of British doctoral students. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 727-738. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070420007221

Harzing, A.-W. (2006). Response styles in cross-national survey research: A 26-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6(2), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595806066332

Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: Mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13(1), 38-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.244

Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., & Block, T. (2013). A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: Interpreting sustainable development in practice. Sustainability Science, 8, 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0184-2

Kemmelmeier, M. (2016). Cultural differences in survey responding: Issues and insights in the study of response biases. International Journal of Psychology, 51(6), 439-444. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12386

Kumar, V., Kaur, A., & Sanderson, L. J. (2024). PhD orals from the convenors' perspective: Implications for academics and candidates. International Journal for Academic Development, 29(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2022.2051516

Machiavelli, N. (2005). The prince (P. Bondanella, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1515).

Murray, R. (2015). How to survive your viva: Defending a thesis in an oral examination (3rd ed.). Open University Press.

Pezzi, S., & Steil, A. V. (2009). Análise do processo de exame de grau na pós-graduação stricto sensu [Analysis of the process of viva voce in graduate programs of degree by research]. Educacao e Pesquisa, 35(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022009000100003

Powell, S., & McCauley, C. (2002). Research degree examining – common principles and divergent practices. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(2), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210423591

Smith, P. B. (2004). Acquiescent response bias as an aspect of cultural communication style. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260380

Soulé, M. E. (1995). The social siege of nature. In M. E. Soulé & G. Lease (Eds.), Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction (pp. 137-170). Island Press.

Stephenson, Z., Jackson, A., & Wilkes, V. (2024). Student experiences of the ‘closed-door’ PhD and doctorate level viva voce: A systematic review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(5), 601-615. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2282941

Tinkler, P., & Jackson, C. (2002). In the dark? Preparing for the PhD viva. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(2), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880210423573

Watts, J. H. (2012). Preparing doctoral candidates for the viva: Issues for students and supervisors. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 36(3), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2011.632819

Wellington, J. (2010). Supporting students' preparation for the viva: Their pre-conceptions and implications for practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510903487867

...