Preschool Teachers’ Preparation Programs: The Use of Puppetry for Early Childhood Science Education
Erdinc Ocal , Abdulhamit Karademir , Ozkan Saatcioglu , Beyza Demirel
This paper investigated how puppetry could be used to improve the standards of early childhood science education. This study determined the effect of .
- Pub. date: May 15, 2021
- Pages: 305-318
- 1275 Downloads
- 1875 Views
- 4 Citations
This paper investigated how puppetry could be used to improve the standards of early childhood science education. This study determined the effect of a puppet-making and puppetry workshop on preservice preschool teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards science education and looked into their experiences during and after puppet-making. Although participants faced some difficulties during the workshop, they developed numerous socioemotional skills. Puppetry activities can help preservice teachers learn how to deliver child-centered, stimulating, and interactive classes. Using puppets in early childhood science education can help teachers develop positive attitudes towards science and offer students high-quality, engaging, and creative activities.
Keywords: Early childhood science education, puppets, teacher education, teaching methods.
References
Akerson, V. L. (2004). Designing a science methods course for early childhood preservice teachers. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 19–32.
Archilla, P. A. (2017). Using drama to promote argumentation in science education. Science & Education, 26(3), 345-375. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11191-017-9901-7
Ballen, C. J., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., Searle, J. B., & Zamudio, K. R. (2017). Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
Braund, M. (2015). Drama and learning science: An empty space? British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 102-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3130
Brenneman, K., & Louro, I. F. (2008). Science journals in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-008-0258-z
Butler, S., Guterman, J., & Rudes, J. (2009). Using puppets with children in narrative therapy to externalize the problem. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 31(3), 225-233.
Camlibel Cakmak, O. (2006). Okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarinin fene ve fen ogretimine yonelik tutumlari ile bazi fen kavramlarini anlama duzeyleri arasindaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationships between preschool teacher candidates' attitudes towards science and science teaching and their level of understanding some science concepts] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Abant İzzet Baysal University.
Cho, H., Kim, J., & Choi, D. H. (2003). Early childhood teachers’ attitudes toward science teaching: A scale validation study. Educational Research Quarterly, 27(2), 33-42.
Clark, V. L. P., & Ivankova, N. V. (2016). Mixed methods research: A Guide to the field. Sage Publications Inc.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Basics of qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Cronje, A., De Beer, J., & Ankiewicz, P. (2015). The development and use of an instrument to investigate science teachers’ views on indigenous knowledge. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/10288457.2015.1108567
De Beer, J., Petersen, N., & Brits, S. (2018). The use of puppetry and drama in the biology classroom. The American Biology Teacher, 80(3), 175-181. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.3.175
Ellis, S. M., & Steyn, H. S. (2003). Practical significance (effect sizes) versus or in combination with statistical significance (p-values). Management Dynamics, 12(4), 51-53.
Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90(8), 694-706.
Epstein, A. (2007). The intentional teacher: Choosing the best strategies for young children’s learning. NAEYC.
Ergazaki, M., Valanidou, E., Kasimati, M. C., & Kalantzi, M. (2015). Introducing a precursor model of inheritance to young children. International Journal of Science Education, 37(18), 3118-3142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1121551
Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336.
Fettahlıoglu, P., Matyar, F., & Ekici, G. (2015). Ogretmen adaylarinin fen ogretimi oz-yeterlik inanclari ile tutumlarinin ogrenme stillerine gore analizi [Analysis of pre-service teachers' science teaching self-efficacy beliefs and attitudes according to their learning styles]. National Education/ Milli Egitim, 205, 125-149.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (and sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll) (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Fulton, L. A., & Simpson-Steele, J. (2016). Reconciling the divide: Common processes in science and arts education. The STEAM Journal, 2(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20160202.03
Garbett, D. (2003). Science education in early childhood teacher education: Putting forward a case to enhance student teachers’ confidence and competence. Research in Science Education, 33, 467–481.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 25 step by step: A simple guide and reference (15th ed.). Taylor & Francis.
Goffin, S. G., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). Curriculum models and early childhood education: Appraising the relationship (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccilo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595441
Gronna, S. S., Serna, L. A., Kennedy, C. H., & Prater, M. A. (1999). Promoting generalized social interactions using puppets and script training in an integrated preschool: A single-case study using multiple baseline design. Behavior modification, 23(3), 419-440.
Gurnon, D., Voss-Andreae, J., & Stanley, J. (2013). Integrating art and science in undergraduate education. PLOS Biology, 11(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001491
Guvenir, Z. (2018). Okul oncesi ogretmenlerinin fen ogretimine yonelik tutumlari ile okul oncesi egitim programinda yer alan fen etkinliklerini uygulama durumlari [Preschool teachers' attitudes towards science teaching and their application of science activities in preschool education program] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Usak University.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). Learning opportunities in preschool and early elementary classrooms. In R. C. Pianta, M. J. Cox, & K. L. Snow (Eds.), School readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (p. 49–83). Paul H Brookes Publishing.
Kallery, M. (2004). Early years teachers’ late concerns and perceived needs in science: An exploratory study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 147–165.
Kallunki, V., Karppinen, S., & Komulainen, K. (2017). Becoming animated when teaching physics, crafts and drama together: A multidisciplinary course for student-teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 32-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1182373
Karademir, A., Kartal, A., & Turk, C. (2020). Science education activities in Turkey: A Qualitative comparison study in preschool classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00981-1
Karademir, A., & Oren, M. (2020). Okul İklimi: Anaokulu yoneticileri ve ogretmenlerin bakiş acisiyla karşilaştirmali bir araştirma [School Climate: A comparative study from the perspective of kindergarten principals and teachers]. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education/ Egitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(1), 206-236. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.10m
Keogh, B., Naylor, S., Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Puppets and engagement in science: A case study. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 4(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.289
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Commentary: A dissenting view on so-called paradoxes of reliability coefficients. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679143
Liang, L. L., & Gabel, D. L. (2005). Effectiveness of a constructivist approach to science instruction for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 27(10), 1143-1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500069442
McBride, E., Oswald, W. W., Beck, L. A., & Vashlishan Murray, A. (2020). “I’m just not that great at science”: Science self‐efficacy in arts and communication students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(4), 597-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21603
McGregor, D. (2014). Chronicling innovative learning in primary classrooms: Conceptualizing a theatrical pedagogy to successfully engage young children learning science. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 9(3), 216-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2014.899544
McGregor, D., & Precious, W. (2010). Applying dramatic science to develop process skills. Science and Children, 48(2), 56–59.
McKillup, S. (2012). Statistics explained: An introductory guide for life scientists (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mertler, C. A., & Vannatta, R. A. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (3rd ed.). Pyrczak Publishing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine (2015). Science Teachers’ Learning: Enhancing Opportunities, Creating Supportive Contexts. The National Academies Press. https://cut.ly/DVlUgFH
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). NAEYC standards for early childhood professional preparation: Position statement. https://cut.ly/ETt9HqL
National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Teachers’ qualifications, instructional practices, and reading and mathematics gains of kindergartners: Research and development report (NCES Publication No. 2006-031). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006031.pdf
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://cut.ly/AzBZlKB
Nayfeld, I., Brenneman, K., & Gelman, R. (2011). Science in the classroom: Finding a balance between autonomous exploration and teacher-led instruction in preschool settings. Early Education & Development, 22(6), 970-988. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.507496
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2010). Educational Assessmenty of Students (6th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Ocal, E. (2014). Vucudumuzdaki sistemler unitesinin ogretiminde drama yonteminin ve kukla/Karagoz uygulamalarının ogrenci başarısı ve tutuma etkisi [The effect of drama method and puppet / Karagoz practices on student achievement and attitude in the teaching of the systems unit in our body] [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Gazi University.
Odegaard, M. (2003). Dramatic science: A critical review of drama in science education. Studies in Science Education, 39(1), 75-101.
Olgan, R., Guner Alpaslan, Z., & Oztekin, C. (2014). Factors influencing preservice early childhood teachers’ outcome expectancy beliefs regarding science teaching. Education and Science, 39(173), 288-298.
Oliveira, A. W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through. Professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20345
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2011). Framework for 21st century learning. https://cut.ly/7In8ain
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel arastırma ve degerlendirme yontemleri [Qualitative research and evaluation methods]. M. Butun & S. B. Demir (Trans. Eds.). Pegem Akademi. (Original work published 2001).
Peck, S. (2005). Puppet power: A discussion of how puppetry supports and enhances reading instruction. In M. Bernier & J. O’Hare (Eds.), Puppetry in education and therapy: Unlocking doors to the mind and heart (pp.73-81). Author House.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2000). The psychology of childhood (H.Weaver, Trans.). Basic Books. (Original work published 1928).
Pugh, K. J., & Girod, M. (2007). Science, art, and experience: Constructing a science pedagogy from Dewey’s aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(1), 9-27.
Ro, J. (2020). Curriculum, standards and professionalisation: The policy discourse on teacher professionalism in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103056
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self‐efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 847-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21221
Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2013). The art and craft of science. Educational Leadership, 70(5), 16-21.
Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2010). “21st century” skills: Not new, but a worthy challenge. American Educator, (Spring), 17–20.
Sackes, M., Akman, B., & Trundle, K. C. (2012). A science methods course for early childhood teachers: A model for undergraduate preservice teacher education. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 1-26.
Sackes, M., Trundle, K. C., Bell, R. L., & O’Connell, A. A. (2011). The influence of early science experience in kindergarten on children’s immediate and later science achievement: Evidence from the early childhood longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20395
Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (2007). Early childhood teachers’ preparation and the quality of program outcomes. Early Child Development and Care, 177(1), 71-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430500317366
Science Outside the Classroom. (2018). Science outside the classroom: Home. https://scienceoutsidetheclassroom.weebly.com
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Ozkan, O. (2002). A case study on science teacher trainees, Education and Science, 27(126), 15-21.
Tekkaya, C., Olgan, R., & Guner, Z. (2010, September 23-25). Okul oncesi ogretmen adaylarının epistemolojik inancları, fen ogretimine yonelik tutum ve ozyeterlikleri [Preschool teacher candidates' epistemological beliefs, attitudes and self-efficacy towards science teaching] [Paper Presentation]. IX. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress, İzmir, Turkey.
Thompson, C. L., & Shrigley, R. L. (1986). What research says: Revising the science attitude scale. School Science and Mathematics, 86(4), 331-343.
Thorndike, R. M., & Thorndike-Christ, T. (2010). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Turk, C., Kartal, A., Karademir, A., & Ocal, E. (2019). Preschool teachers’ views of classroom management processes. International Journal of Turkish Literature Culture Education/ Uluslararası Turkce Edebiyat Kultur Egitim Dergisi, 8(4), 2282-2299.