Amrhein, V., Greenland, S., & McShane, B. (2019). Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature, 567(7748), 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9

Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2020, January 15). Reading scores: States not doing right by kids in Title I schools. Kids Count Data Center. https://bit.ly/3IkdIY8  

Barcelona, K. (2014). 21st century curriculum change initiative: A focus on STEM education as an integrated approach to teaching and learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 2(10), 862-875. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-2-10-4

Becker, K. H., & Park, K. (2011). Integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of STEM education: Innovations and research, 12(5), 23-37.

Bravo, M. A., & Cervetti, G. N. (2014). Attending to the language and literacy needs of English learners in science. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(2), 230-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.900418

Brown, P. M., Corrigan, M. W., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of prosocial education. Rowman & Littlefield.

Bybee, R. W. (2014). NGSS and the next generation of science teachers. Journal of science teacher education, 25(2), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9381-4

Campbell, T., Schwarz, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). What we call misconceptions may be necessary stepping-stones toward making sense of the world. The Science Teacher, 83(3), 69-74. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst16_083_03_69

Catterall, J. S. (2009). Doing well and doing good by doing art: The long-term effects of sustained involvement in the visual and performing arts during high school: results of a 12-year national study. Imagination Group/I-Group Books.

Castro-Alonso, J. C., Paas, F., & Ginns, P. (2019). Embodied cognition, science education, and visuospatial processing. In J. C. Castro-Alonso (Ed.), Visuospatial processing for education in health and natural sciences (pp. 175–205). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20969-8_7

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441

Corrigan, M. W., Higgins-D'Alessandro, A., & Brown P. M. (2013). The case for adding prosocial education to current education policy: Preparing students for the tests of life, not just a life of tests. Kedi Journal of Educational Policy, 10(3), 37-50. https://Bit.ly/3nJKiL8

Crowder, M. J., & Hand, D. J. (2017). Analysis of repeated measures. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315137421

Daugherty, M. K. (2013). The prospect of an "A" in STEM education. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 14(2), 10-15. https://bit.ly/3IojpnU

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Penguin.

Donovan, L., & Pascale, L. (2012). Integrating the arts across the content areas. Teacher Created Materials.

Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School science and mathematics, 103(3), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18230.x

Fillmore, L. W. (2007). English Learners and mathematics learning: Language issues to consider. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Assessing Mathematical Proficiency (pp. 333–344). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511755378.026

Gess, A. H. (2017). STEAM education: Separating fact from fiction. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 77(3), 39–41. https://Bit.ly/3GNjp0t  

Ghanbari, S. (2015). Learning across disciplines: A collective case study of two university programs that integrate the arts with STEM. International Journal of Education & the arts,16(7), 1-22. http://www.ijea.org/v16n7/

Glenberg, A. M. (2011). How reading comprehension is embodied and why that matters. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 5-18. bit.ly/3tHoZ0r

Goldenberg, C. (2013). Unlocking the research on English learners: What we know--and don't yet know--about effective instruction. American Educator, 37(2), 4-11. https://bit/ly/3rE0puM

González-Howard, M., & Suárez, E. (2021). Retiring the term English language learners: Moving toward linguistic justice through asset-oriented framing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(5), 749–752. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21684

Guyotte, K. W., Sochacka, N. W., Costantino, T. E., Walther, J., & Kellam, N. N. (2014). STEAM as social practice: Cultivating creativity in transdisciplinary spaces. Art Education, 67(6), 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293

Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2016). ‘Artistic’ Science Education. In Y. Hadzigeorgiou (Ed.), Imaginative Science Education: The Central Role of Imagination in Science Education (pp. 185–215). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29526-8_7

Hardiman, M., Magsamen, G. M., McKhann, G., & Eilber, J. (2009). Neuroeducation: Learning, arts and the brain. John Hopkins University. https://bit.ly/3qNLQG1

Heilig, J. V., Cole, H., & Aguilar, A. (2010). From Dewey to No Child Left Behind: The evolution and devolution of public arts education. arts Education Policy Review, 111(4), 136-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2010.490776

Hetland, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. M. (2015). Studio thinking 2: The real benefits of visual arts education. Teachers College Press.

Huerta, M., & Jackson, J. (2010). Connecting literacy and science to increase achievement for English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(3), 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-010-0402-4

Hwang, J., & Taylor, J. C. (2016). Stemming on STEM: A STEM education framework for students with disabilities. Journal of Science Education for Students with Disabilities, 19(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.14448/jsesd.09.0003

Ingram, D., & Riedel, E. (2003). What does arts integration do for students? [Report]. Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement. https://Bit.ly/3GM2tas   

Ioannidis, J. P. (2019). The importance of predefined rules and prespecified statistical analyses: do not abandon significance. Jama, 321(21), 2067-2068. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.4582

Jones, B., & Kenward, M. G. (1989). Design and analysis of cross-over trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203009277

Karakelle, S. (2009). Enhancing fluent and flexible thinking through the creative drama process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.05.002

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM education, 3(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z

Lee, H. K. (2005). Rethinking arts marketing in a changing cultural policy context. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 10(3), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.9

Lee, O., Llosa, L., Grapin, S., Haas, A., & Goggins, M. (2019). Science and language integration with English learners: A conceptual framework guiding instructional materials development. Science Education, 103(2), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21498

Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003 results from the U.S. perspective. Highlights. NCES 2005-003. US Department of Education. https://Bit.ly/3fJJCB6  

Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873

Lichtenberg, J., Woock, C., & Wright, M. (2008). Ready to innovate: Are educators and executives aligned on the creative readiness of the US workforce? Americans for the Arts. https://bit.ly/3AhUqji  

Luftig, R. L. (2000). An investigation of an arts infusion program on creative thinking, academic achievement, affective functioning, and arts appreciation of children at three grade levels. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 208-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2000.11651678

Madden, M. E., Baxter, M., Beauchamp, H., Bouchard, K., Habermas, D., Huff, M., Ladd, B., Pearon, J., & Plague, G. (2013). Rethinking STEM Education: An Interdisciplinary STEAM Curriculum. Procedia Computer Science, 20, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.316

May, G. S. (2015, March 30). STEM, not STEAM. Inside Higher Ed. https://Bit.ly/3fKcUiR

Mehu, M., Little, A. C., & Dunbar, R. I. (2008). Sex differences in the effect of smiling on social judgments: an evolutionary approach. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(3), 103-121. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099351

Moga, E., Burger, K., Hetland, L., & Winner, E. (2000). Does studying the arts engender creative thinking? Evidence for near but not far transfer. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333639

National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). The condition of education 2000 (NCES 2000-062). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2000/2000062.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006 (NCES 2008-016). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2008/2008016.pdf

National Center for Education Statistics. (2014). The condition of education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014083.pdf

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. The National Academies Press.

Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED541511

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007a). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/39725224.pdf

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007b). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World. OECD briefing note for the United States. https://www.oecd.org/unitedstates/39722597.pdf

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Ready to learn: Students’ engagement, drive and self-beliefs (volume III). https://Bit.ly/3AjVhQH  

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020), Science performance (PISA) (indicator). https://doi.org/10.1787/91952204-en

Ormrod, J. E. (2011). Educational psychology: Developing learners (7th ed.). Pearson.

Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic education, 34(3/4), 239-275. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333644

Poza, L. E. (2018). The language of ciencia: Translanguaging and learning in a bilingual science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1125849

Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Highlights from TIMSS 2011: Mathematics and science achievement of US fourth-and eighth-grade students in an international context. NCES 2013-009. National Center for Education Statistics. https://Bit.ly/3rAa2eb

Schlaack, N., & Steele, J. S. (2018). The collaborative residency project: The influence of co-teaching on professional development in arts integration. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 19(11), 1-29. http://www.ijea.org/v19n11/

Segarra, V. A., Natalizio, B., Falkenberg, C. V., Pulford, S., & Holmes, R. M. (2018). STEAM: Using the arts to train well-rounded and creative scientists. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1360

Suárez, E. (2020). “Estoy Explorando Science”: Emergent bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging. Science Education, 104(5), 791-826. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21588

Ünsal, Z., Jakobson, B., Wickman, P. O., & Molander, B. O. (2018). Gesticulating science: Emergent bilingual students’ use of gestures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(1), 121-144. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21415

Wahyuningsih, S., Nurjanah, N. E., Rasmani, U. E. E., Hafidah, R., Pudyaningtyas, A. R., & Syamsuddin, M. M. (2020). STEAM learning in early childhood education: A literature review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 4(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v4i1.39855

Walker, E., Tabone, C., & Weltsek, G. (2011). When achievement data meet drama and arts integration. Language Arts, 88(5), 365-372. https://Bit.ly/3Ks0SJg

Wilmes, S. E., & Siry, C. (2020). Science notebooks as interactional spaces in a multilingual classroom: Not just ideas on paper. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 999-1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21615