Anastasiadou, S. D., & Karakos, A. S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1), 37-51.

Angeli, C., Voogt, J., Fluck, A., Webb, M., Cox, M., Malyn-Smith, J., & Zagami, J. (2016). A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: Implications for teacher knowledge. Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 47–57.

Askar, P., & Davenport, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for Java programming. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET January, 8(1), 1-7.

Atmatzidou, S., & Demetriadis, S. (2016). Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: a study on age and gender relevant differences. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 75(2), 661–670.

Avcu, Y. E., & Er, K. O. (2017). Education of gifted and talented individuals in Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Turkey: An investigation of education policies and its implementations. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(4), 1154-1170. https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.04.018

Avcu, Y.E., & Er, K.O. (2020). Developing an instructional design for the field of ICT and software for gifted and talented students. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(1), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.1.161

Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? Acm Inroads, 2(1), 48-54.

Brennan, K., & Resnick, M. (2012, April 13-17). Using artifact-based interviews to study the development of computational thinking in interactive media design [Paper presentation]. Annual American Educational Research Association Meeting, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Burke, Q. (2012). The Markings of a New Pencil: Introducing programming-as-writing in the middle school classroom. The National Association for Media Literacy Education’s Journal of Media Literacy Education, 4(2), 121-135.

Buyukozturk, S. (2014). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analizi el kitabi: Istatistik, arastirma deseni, SPSS uygulamalari ve yorum [Data analysis handbook for social sciences: Statistics, research design, SPSS applications and interpretation]. Pegem Akademi.

Buyukozturk, S., Kilic-Cakmak, E., Akgun, O. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri [Scientific research methods]. Pegem Akademi.

Cakir, C., & Mutlu-Bayraktar, D. (2019). Programlama egitiminin ustun yetenekli ogrencilerin bilgi islemsel dusunme becerisine ve bilisim teknolojilerine yonelik oz yeterlik algilarina etkisi [The effect of programming training on gifted students’ thinking skills and self-efficacy perceptions of information technologies]. In S. Emir (Ed.), VI. National Gifted Education Congress (pp. 63–77). Istanbul University.

Can, A. (2014). SPSS ile bilimsel arastirma surecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in scientific research process with SPSS]. Pegem Akademi.

Cetin, I., & Toluk-Ucar Z. (2018). Bilgi islemsel dusunme tanimi ve kapsami [Definition and scope of computational thinking]. In Y. Gulbahar (Ed.), Bilgi islemsel dusunmeden programlamaya [From computional thinking to programming] (pp.41-74). Pegem Akademi.

Ciftci, S., Cengel, M., & Paf, M. (2018). Reflective thinking skills on computational thinking and problem solving as a predictor of self-efficacy of informatics teacher candidates on programming. Ahi Evran University Magazine of the Faculty of Education, 19(1), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2018.19.009

Cigdem, H. (2015). How does self-regulation affect computer-programming achievement in a blended context? Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(1), 19-37.

Citil, M. (2018). Turkiye’de ustun yeteneklilerin egitimi politikalarinin degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of gifted students’ education policy in Turkey]. Journal of National Education/Milli Egitim Dergisi, 47(Special Issue 1), 143-172.

Citil, M., & Ozdemir-Kilic, M. (2019). Ozel yetenekliler alanina giris. In O. Kilic & M. Citil (Eds.). Ozel yetenekli ogrencim var [I have a gifted and talented student] (pp.98-119). Gokce Ofset.

Cetin, I., & Toluk-Ucar Z. (2018). Bilgi islemsel dusunme tanimi ve kapsami [Definition and scope of computational thinking]. In Y. Gulbahar (Ed.), Bilgi islemsel dusunmeden programlamaya [From computional thinking to programming] (pp.41-74). Pegem Akademi.

Clark, B. (2015). Ustun zekal i ogrencileri anlamak [Understanging the gifted students]. In F. Kaya & U. Ogurlu (Eds.), Ustun zekali olarak buyumek [Growing Up Gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at School and at Home] (pp.1-34). Nobel Akademik.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Constantinou, V., & Ioannou, A. (2018, September 3-6). Development of computational thinking skills through educational robotics [Paper presentation]. 13th European Conference On Technology Enhanced Learning, Leeds, UK.

Csizmadia, A., Curzon, P., Dorling, M., Humphreys, S., Ng, T., Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2015). Computational thinking a guide for teachers. Computing At School. https://www.computingatschool.org.uk/computationalthinking

Davidson, K., Larzon, L., & Ljunggren, K. (2010). Self-Efficacy in Programming among STS Students. Upssala University. https://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/datadidaktik/ht10/reports/Self-Efficacy.pdf

Demirhan, E., Elmali, S., & Besoluk, S. (2018). How to raise awareness in society on the importance of gifted students? Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 1(1), 1-6.

Donmez, I, Kirmit, S., Gurbuz, S., & Birsen, O. (2018, May 4-6). Ustun yetenekli ogrencilerin bilgisayarca dusunme becerilerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of computational thinking skills of gifted students] [Paper presentation]. V. Gifted and Education Congress, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Edins, C. A. (2010). Self-efficacy and self-esteem in gifted and non-gifted students in the elementary school system (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Capella.

Faber, H. H., Wierdsma, M. D., Doornbos, R. P., van der Ven, J. S., & de Vette, K. (2017). Teaching computational thinking to primary school students via unplugged programming lessons. Journal of the European Teacher Education Network, 12(5), 13-24.

Freeman, A., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Davis, A., & Hall Giesinger, C. (2017). The Horizon Report. K–12 Edition Examines Emerging Technologies for Their Potential Impact On and Use in Teaching, Learning, And Creative Inquiry in Schools. Retrieved from Eric database.

Fronza, I., Corral, L., & El Ioini, N. (2016, May 4-6). Computational thinking through mobile programming [16th Annual Conference on Information Technology Education, Chicago, Illinois., USA.

Garcia-Valcarcel Munoz-Repiso, A., & Caballero-Gonzalez, Y. A. (2019). Robotics to develop computational thinking in early childhood education. Media Education Research Journal, 59(17), 63-72.

Garson, G.D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Statistical Associates Publishing.

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013, March 6-9). Using a discourse- intensive pedagogy and android’s app inventor for introducing computational concepts to middle school students [Paper presentation].SIGCSE’13, Colorado, USA.

Gulbahar, Y. (2018). Bilgi islemsel dusunme ve programlama konusunda degisim ve donusumler [Changes and transformations in computional thinking and programming]. In Y. Gulbahar (Ed.), Bilgi islemsel dusunmeden programlamaya [From computional thinking to programming] (pp.395-411). Pegem Akademi.

Gulbahar, Y. Kert, S. B., & Kalelioglu F. (2019). The self-efficacy perception scale for computational thinking skill: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 1-29.

Hoaglin, D. C., Iglewicz, B., & Tukey, J. W. (1986). Performance of some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 991-999.

Hoaglin, D. C., & Iglewicz, B. (1987). Fine-tuning some resistant rules for outlier labeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(400), 1147-1149.

Hongwarittorrn, N., & Krairit, D. (2010, April 6-9). Effects of program visualization on students' performance and attitudes towards java programming [Paper presentation]. The International conference on Computing, Communication and Control Technologies, Orlando, Florida.

Hsu, T. C., Chang, S. C., & Hung, Y. T. (2018). How to learn and how to teach computational thinking: Suggestions based on a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 126(11), 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.004

Ibili, E., Gunbatar, M. S., & Sirakaya, M. (2020). Bilgi-islemsel dusunme becerilerinin incelenmesi: meslek liseleri orneklemi [An examinat ion of the computational thinking skills: Sample of vocational high schools]. Kastamonu Education Journal/Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, 28(2), 1067-1078.

International Society for Technology in Education (2016). ISTE standarts for students. ISTE. https://www.iste.org/standards/for-students

Kanaparan, G., Cullen, R., & Mason, D. (2017, December 4-6). Effect of self-efficacy and emotional engagement on introductory programming students [Paper presentation]. Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Hobart, Australia.

Karasar, N. (2014). Bilimsel arastirme yontemi (kavramlar ilkeler teknikler) [Scientific research method (concepts, principles, techniques)] (27^th Edition). Nobel Akademik.

Kert, S. B. (2018). Programlama ogretimi icin pedagojik yaklas imlar [Pedagogical approaches for programming teaching]. In Y. Gulbahar, & H. Karal (Eds.), Kuramdan uygulamaya programlama ogretimi [Theory-to-practice programming teaching] (pp.93-130). Pegem Akademi.

Kirmit, S., Donmez, I., & Cataltas, H. E. (2018). Ustun yetenekli ogrencilerin bilgisayarca dusunme becerilerinin incelenmesi [The study of gifted students’ computational thinking skills]. Journal of STEAM Education, 1(2), 17-26.

Kong, S. C. (2017). Development and validation of a programming self-efficacy scale for senior primary school learners. In S. C. Kong, J. Sheldon, & K. Y. Li (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Thinking Education (pp. 97–102). The Education University of Hong Kong.

Kong, S. C. (2019). Components and methods of evaluating computational thinking for fostering creative problem-solvers in senior primary school education. In S. C. Kong, & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp.119-141). Springer Open Access.

Kong, S. C., Chiu, M. M., & Lai, M. (2018). A study of primary school students' interest, collaboration attitude, and programming empowerment in computational thinking education. Computers & Education, 127(12), 178-189.

Korkmaz, O., Cakir, R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2015). Bilgisayarca dusunme beceri duzeyleri olceginin ortaokul duzeyine uyarlanmas i [Computational thinking levels scale adaptation for secondary school level]. Gazi Journal of Educational Science/ Gazi Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(2), 67-86.

Koroglu, I. S. (2015). Ustun yetenekli dijital yerlilerin sosyal medya kullanimlari uzerine nicel bir calisma [Social media usage of gifted digital natives: a quantitative study]. Journal of Communication Theory & Research/ Iletisim Kuram ve Arastirma Dergisi, 40(2), 266-290.

Kukul, V., Gokcearslan, S., & Gunbatar, M. S. (2017). Computer programming self-efficacy scale for secondary school students: Development, validation and reliability. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(1), 158-179.

Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017, March 22). Computational thinking in education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. Cornell University Archive. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.07659

Lye, S. Z., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12? Computers in Human Behavior, 41(12), 51–61.

Merriman, L. (2012). Developing academic self-efficacy: Strategies to support gifted elementary school students (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of California.

Ministry of National Education. (2013). Ozel yetenekli bireyler strateji ve uygulama plani 2013-2017 [Strategy and implementation plan for gifted and talented individuals 2013-2017]. Milli Egitim Bakanligi Yayinevi/ Ministry of National Education Publishing Service.

Ongoz, S., & Sozel, H. K. (2018). Ustun yeteneklilerin egitiminde teknoloji kullanimi [Use of technology in gifted education]. In H. F. Odabasi (Ed.), Ozel egitim ve egitim teknolojisi [Special education and educational technology] (pp.91-114). Pegem Akademi.

Ramalingam, V., & Wiedenbeck, S. (1998). Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analyses of novice programmer selfefficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(4), 367-381.

Repenning, R., Webb, D.C., Koh, K.H., Nickerson, N., Miller, B., Brand, S.B., & Repenning, N. (2015). Scalable game design: a strategy to bring systemic computer science education to schools through game design and simulation creation. Trantions on Computing Education, 15(2), 1-31.

Rodrigez, B. R. (2017). Assessing computational thinking in computer science unplugged activities (Unpublished master’s thesis). Colorado School of Mines.

Roman-Gonzalez, M., Perez-Gonzalez, J. C., Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2016). Does computational thinking correlate with personality? The non-cognitive side of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 51-58). Association for Computing Machinery.

Roman-Gonzalez, M., Perez-Gonzalez, J. C., Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2018a). Can computational talent be detected? Predictive validity of the computational thinking test. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 18(11), 47-58.

Roman-Gonzalez, M., Perez-Gonzalez, J. C., Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2018b). Extending the nomological network of computational thinking with non-cognitive factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 80(3), 441-459.

Roman-Gonzalez, M., Moreno-Leon, J., & Robles, G. (2019). Combining assessment tools for a comprehensive evaluation of computational thinking interventions. In S. C. Kong, & H. Abelson (Eds.), Computational thinking education (pp.79-98). Springer Open Access.

Sak, U. (2014). Ustun zekalilar ozellikleri tanilanmalari egitimleri [Gifted and talented students, their characteristics identification education]. Vize Yayincilik.

Sak, U., Ayas, M. B., Sezerel, B. B., Opengin, E., Ozdemir, N. N., & Gurbuz, S. D. (2015). Turkiye’de ustun yeteneklilerin egitiminin elestirel bir degerlendirmesi [Gifted and talented education in Turkey: critics and prospects]. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education/Turk Ustun Zeka ve Egitim Dergisi, 5(2), 110-132.

Secer, I. (2015). SPSS ve LISREL ile pratik veri analizi [Practical data analysis with SPSS and LISREL]. (2nd Edition). Ani Yayincilik.

Selby, C., & Woollard, J. (2013). Computational thinking: The developing definition. In J. Carter, I. Utting, & A. Clear (Eds.), Proceedings of 18th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (p.6). University of Southampton.

Siegle, D. (2004). Identifying students with gifts and talents in technology. Gifted Child Today, 27(4), 30-34.

Sullivan, A., Bers, M., & Mihm, C. (2017). Playing, and coding with KIBO: Using robotics to foster computational thinking in young children. In Proc. CTE 2017 (International Conf. on Computational Thinking Education) (pp. 110-115). The Education University of Hong Kong.

University of Phoenix Research Institute. (2011). Future work skills 2020. http://www.iftf.org/uploads/me­dia/SR-1382A_UPRI_future_work_skills_sm.pdf

Unsal-Serim, E. (2019). Investigation of computational thinking skills and selfefficacy perceptions of coding with coding education designed by gamification method (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Balikesir.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Edition). Pearson Education.

Tehseen, S., Ramayah, T., & Sajilan, S. (2017). Testing and controlling for common method variance: A review of available methods. Journal of Management Sciences, 4(2), 142-168.

Tekinarslan, E., & Cetin, I. (2018). Bilissel, duyussal ve sosyal acidan programlama ogretimi [Programming teaching in terms of cognitive, affective and social issues]. In Y. Gulbahar, & H. Karal (Eds.), Kuramdan uygulamaya programlama ogretimi [Theory-to-practice programming teaching] (pp.68-89). Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052415092

Uzumcu, O, & Ucar, M. (2018, May 4-6). Ustun yetenekli ogrencilerin temel duzeyde bilgi islemsel dusunme becerilerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of gifted students’ basic level of computational thinking skills] [Paper presentation].V. Gifted and Education Congress, Gaziantep, Turkey.

Waite, J. (2017, May 13). Pedagogy in teaching computer science in schools: A Literature Review. Queen Mary University of London and King's College London. https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/computing-education/literature-review-pedagogy-in-teaching.pdf

Weese, J. L., & Feldhausen, R. (2017, June 25-28). STEM outreach: assessing computational thinking and problem solving. [Paper presentation].ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.

Wing, J. M. (2011, November 17). Computational thinking: What and why? http://www.cs.cmu.edu/link/research-notebook-computational-thinking-what-and-why

Yildiz-Durak, Karaoglan-Yilmaz, F. G., & Yilmaz, R. (2019). Computational thinking, programming self-efficacy, problem solving and experiences in the programming process conducted with robotic activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 173-197.

Yildiz-Durak, H., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116(1), 191-202.