Higher Education Teachers´ Conceptions of Professional Development and Change: A Longitudinal Case Study of University Pedagogy Prospects
The aim of this research is to find out how higher education (HE) teachers reflect on the possibilities of personal development and evaluate the insti.
- Pub. date: August 15, 2022
- Pages: 609-623
- 393 Downloads
- 903 Views
- 2 Citations
The aim of this research is to find out how higher education (HE) teachers reflect on the possibilities of personal development and evaluate the institutional promotion of academic teaching in an HE community. The purpose was thus to understand how university employed teachers experienced and reflected on the benefits of their pedagogical education and pedagogical fellowship during and after the studies. To obtain information regarding the current situations and prospects for the future of the research persons, questionnaires were used, and unstructured essays were written through their study time and subsequently. The research methods were qualitative content analysis and deep analysing methods. The teachers possess cognitive thinking skills of the highest level. Pedagogical and transformative thinking are not at the same level. The research persons express their views tactfully when outlining how teaching should be realized in the future. Still, they criticized the resistance to changes in academic teaching, especially before they themselves were part of the administration.
critical experience collective individualism holarchy professional identity self assessment
Keywords: Critical experience, collective individualism, holarchy, professional identity, self-assessment.
References
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching (1st ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Barshay, J. (2019, December 30). 10 of the most popular stories about education research in 2019: Debunking critical thinking, 'grit' and what goes on in gifted classes. The Hechinger Report. https://bit.ly/3zKJvi6
Bates, A. W. T. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https://bit.ly/2T959GU
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Open University Press. https://doi.org/b4jhnm
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experienced and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14. https://doi.org/bnb4mv
Cranton, P. (1994). Understanding and promoting transformative learning. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). The handbook of qualitative research. SAGE. https://doi.org/bnq4mh
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Elbaz, F. L. (1981). The teacher´s practical knowledge: Reports of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11, 43-71. https://doi.org/h7sg
Ennis, R. H. (2011). An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. Critical Thinking across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/fz7chz
Facione, P. A. (2004). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment. https://bit.ly/3BSc93v
Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/gj83cv
Fischer, A., & Scriven, M. (1997). Critical thinking: Its definition and assessment. Centre for Research in Critical Thinking, University of East Anglia. https://doi.org/d4655r
Gidley, J. (2013). Global knowledge futures: Articulating the emergence of a field. Integral Review, 9(2), 145-172. https://bit.ly/3JElONa
Gidley, J. (2016). Postformal education: A philosophy for complex futures. Springer. https://doi.org/h7r7
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies (2nd ed). Routledge. https://doi.org/h7r8
Hiltunen, E. (2017). Mitä tulevaisuuden asiakas haluaa? [What does the future customer want?] Docendo. https://bit.ly/3zL9Dti
Hitzler, R. (2005). The reconstruction of meaning. Notes on German interpretive sociology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.7
Illeris, K. (2014). Transformative learning and identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/gfn8jp
Karjalainen, A., & Nissilä, S.-P. (2008a, June 2–3). Widening identities, developing competencies. A pilot program for general pedagogical competence of HE teachers [Paper presentation]. ISATT Symposium, University of Lapland, Finland.
Karjalainen, A., & Nissilä, S. -P. (2008b). Designing and piloting 60 ects-credit teacher education program for university teachers. Staff and Organization Development for Teaching and Research/ Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung in Einrichtungen der Lehre und Forschung, 2008(1+2), 24-28. https://bit.ly/3slZ9ge
Karjalainen, A., & Nissilä, S.-P. (2011). Challenge for teachers´ professional growth. How to become change agents in HE organizations? In I. Zogla, L. Rutka & L. Daniela (Eds), Teachers´ lifecycle from initial teacher education to experienced professional (pp. 205-216). University of Latvia, Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Art.
Karjalainen, A., & Siljander, P. (1993). Miten tulkita sosiaalista interaktiota? [How to interpret social interaction?] Kasvatus, 24(4), 334-346.
Krátká, J. (2014). Tacit knowledge in stories of expert teachers. Science Direct, 837-846. https://doi.org/ggdbpb
Krohn, L. (1989). Rapina. WSOY.
Kezar, A., & Lester, J. (2009). Organizing higher education for collaboration. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Kuusi, O., Hiltunen, E., & Linturi, H. (2000). Heikot tulevaisuuden signaalit: Delfoi-tutkimus [Weak future signals: Delphi study]. Futura, 19(2), 21-24. https://bit.ly/3payOAQ
Lavoy, D. (2014, March 11). Is collaboration limited by organizational structure? CMSWire.
Leanza, M. (2008). Kritik als Latenzbeobachtung: Darstellung und Diskussion grundlegender Konzepte der Objektiven Hermeneutik und deren Anwendung am konkreten Fall [Critique of latent observation, demonstration and discussion concerning the basic concept in objective hermeneutics]. In U. Freikamp, M. Leanza, J. Mende, S. Müller, P. Ullrich, & H. -J. Voss (Eds.), Kritik mit Methode? Forschungsmethoden und Gesellschaftskritik [The critique of methods? Research methods and social critique] (pp. 73–104). https://doi.org/h7sf
Lefrançois, G. R. (2019). Theories of human learning: Mrs Gribbin’s cat (7th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Lueger, M., & Vettori, O. (2014). Finding meaning in higher education: A social hermeneutics approach to higher education research. Theory and method in higher education research II: International perspectives on higher education research (Vol.10, pp. 23-42). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/h7r9
Maiwald, K.-O. (2005). Competence and praxis: Sequential analysis in German sociology. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum of Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Article 31. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.21
Martin, A., Tarnanen, M., & Tynjälä, P. (2018). Exploring teachers´ stories of writing: Narrative perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 24(6), 690-705. https://doi.org/gp7ftg
Mayer, R. E., & Clark, R. (2002). The promise of educational psychology (vol II): Teaching for meaningful learning. Performance Improvement, 42(4), 41-43. https://doi.org/cpjwvv
Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood. A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1-20). Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. Jossey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1995). Transformation theory of adult learning. In M. Welton (Ed.), In defence of the lifeworld, critical perspectives on adult learning (pp. 37-90). New York State University of New York Press.
Morin, E. (2001). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Morrow, S. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250-260. https://doi.org/brmq95
Nissilä, S.-P. (2005). Individual and collective reflection: How to meet the needs of development in teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 209–219. https://doi.org/csmj57
Nissilä, S.-P. (2006). Dynamic dialogue in learning and teaching. Towards transformation in vocational teacher education [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University, Tampere University Press]. Tampere University Trepo. https://bit.ly/3SRBX6a
Nissilä, S.-P. (2010). Dynamic dialogue in learning and teaching: Towards transformation in vocational teacher education. VDM Publishing House Ltd.
Oevermann, U., Allert, T., Konau, E., & Krambeck, J. (1979). Die Methodologie einer `Objektiven Hermeneutik‘ und ihre Allgemeine Forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften [The methodology of `objective hermeneutics` and the meaning of its general research logics in social sciences]. In H. -G. Soeffner (Ed.), Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften [Interpretative Measures in Social and Text Sciences] (pp. 352–434). Metzler Verlag. https://bit.ly/3Ph113c
Oevermann, U., Allert,T., & Krambeck, J. (1983). Die Methodologie einer objektiven hermeneutik [The methodology of objective hermeneutics.] In P. Zedler & P. H. Moser (Eds.), Aspekte qualitativer sozialforschung [Aspects of qualitative social research] (pp. 95–123). Lesle verlag+Budrich GmbH.
Patel, V., Groen, G., & Fredriksen, C. (1986). Differences between students and physicians in memory for clinical cases. Medical Education, 20(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/d78th9
Reicher, S., Haslam, S., & Hopkins, N. (2005). Social identity and the dynamics of leadership: Leaders and followers as collaborative agents in the transformation of social reality. Leadership Quarterly, 16(4), 547-568. https://doi.org/bsrvd9
Reichertz, J. (2004). Objective hermeneutics and hermeneutic sociology of knowledge. In U. Flick, E. von Kardorff, I. Steinke, & B. A. Jenner (Eds.), Companion to qualitative research (pp. 570-582). SAGE. https://bit.ly/3PeNERg
Schnettler, B. (2002). Social constructivism, hermeneutics, and the sociology of knowledge. Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 3(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.4.785
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/d2qjr4
Senge, P. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization (Revised and updated ed.). Penguin Random House.
Siljander, P., & Karjalainen, A. (1991). Merkityksen käsite kasvatustieteessä [The conception of meaning in educational science]. Kasvatus, 22(5-6), 377- 387.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1976). General system theory. A bridge between two cultures. Behavioral Science, 21(4), 228-139. https://doi.org/chwpdv
Wolf, A. J. (2010). Transcending paradox: Movement as a means for sustaining high performance. In W. A. Pasmore, A. B. (Rami) Shani, & R. W. Woodman (Eds), Research in organizational change and development (Vol.18., pp. 77-107). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/c5bqtc
Yanchar, S. C., & Slife, B. D. (2004). Teaching critical thinking by examining assumptions. Teach Psychology, 31(2), 85-90. https://doi.org/cdd6j7
Zajonc, A. (2002). Dawning of free communities for collective wisdom. https://bit.ly/3vMgAJx