The Effect of Coding Education on Analytical Thinking of Gifted Students
This research aims to examine the effect of coding education on the analytical thinking skills of gifted students. The participants are 18 students, 1.
- Pub. date: February 15, 2023
- Pages: 95-106
- 446 Downloads
- 1118 Views
- 0 Citations
This research aims to examine the effect of coding education on the analytical thinking skills of gifted students. The participants are 18 students, 11 to 12 years old. An embedded experimental mixed design was used in the research. The data collection was carried out with the Analytical Thinking Skill Scale to determine the difference in the analytical thinking skills of the study group before and after the coding training; the Analytical Thinking Skill Observation Form to determine the analytical thinking skill levels during the implementation process; and the semi-structured interview form to get their opinions on the coding training. The data were analyzed with a pre-test-post-test quasi-experimental design, descriptive analysis, and content analysis. The results show that coding education developed the participants' analytical thinking skills. The difference in the analytical thinking skills of the study group was not statistically significant in terms of gender. According to the students' views on the coding education application process, there was an improvement in the sub-dimensions of sorting, classification, comparison, and evaluation in analytical thinking skills; coding education developed problem-solving and thinking skills, was useful, encouraged students to choose a profession, and was entertaining, as well as negative opinions such as being difficult, boring, and requiring a lack of time.
Keywords: Analytical thinking, coding, gifted students.
References
Akçay, A., & Çoklar, A. N. (2016). Bilişsel becerilerin gelişimine yönelik bir öneri: Programlama eğitimi [A suggestion for the development of cognitive skills: Programming education]. In A. İşman, H. F. Odabaşı & B. Akkoyunlu (Eds.), Educational technology readings (pp. 121- 140). TOJET-Sakarya University. https://l24.im/Dkle1SN
Akpınar, Y., & Altun, A. (2014). Bilgi toplumu okullarında programlama eğitimi gereksinimi [The need for programming education in information society schools]. Elementary Education Online, 13(1), 1-4. https://bit.ly/3Z8elgJ
Aljughaiman, A. M., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2012). The effect of an enrichment program on developing analytical, creative, and practical abilities of elementary gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353212440616
Ashenfelter, E. (2017). From the Classroom: A guide to teaching coding using Google’s CS First. Gifted Child Today, 40(4), 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517722578
Bocconi, S., Chioccariello, A., Dettori, G., Ferrari, A., Engelhardt, K., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2016). Exploring the field of computational thinking as a 21st century skill. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN16 Proceedings (pp. 4725-4733). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2016.2136
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences] (11th ed.). Pegem Akademi.
Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2015). Pesquisa de métodos mistos: Série métodos de pesquisa [Mixed methods research: Research methods series]. Penso Editora.
Demirer, V., & Sak, N. (2016). Programming education and new approaches around the world and in Turkey. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 12(3), 521–546. https://bit.ly/3ZrI6t9
Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2005). How to design and evaluate research in education with PowerWeb (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Genç, Z., & Karakuş, S. (2011). Tasarımla öğrenme: Eğitsel bilgisayar oyunları tasarımında scratch kullanımı [Learning through design: Using scratch in instructional computer games design]. In Z. Genç (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium (pp. 981-987). Fırat University. https://bit.ly/3IwcFrk
Good, J. (2011). Learners at the wheel: Novice programming environments come of age. International Journal of People-Oriented Programming, 1(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijpop.2011010101
Göksoy, S., & Yılmaz, İ. (2018). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenleri ve öğrencilerinin robotik ve kodlama dersine ilişkin görüşleri [The opınıons of ınformatıon relatıons teacher and theır students wıth regard to lessons of robots and decodıng]. Düzce Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(1), 178-196. https://bit.ly/3igdD06
Hagge, J. (2017). Scratching beyond the surface of literacy: Programming for early adolescent gifted students. Gifted Child Today, 40(3), 154-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217517707233
Hwang, W. Y., Wang, C. Y., Hwang, G. J., Huang, Y. M., & Huang, S. (2008). A web-based programming learning environment to support cognitive development. Interacting with Computers, 20(6), 524-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2008.07.002
Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected code: Why children need to learn programming. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9992.001.0001
Kalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners' perspective. Informatics in Education, 13(1), 33-50. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.03
Kalelioğlu, F., Gülbahar, Y., Akçay, S., & Doğan, D. (2014). Curriculum integration ideas for improving the computational thinking skills of learners through programming via scratch. In Y. Gülbahar & E. Karataş (Eds.), Informatics in School Teaching and Learning Perspectives: 7th International Conference On Informatics in Schools: Situation, Evolution and Perspectives, (pp. 22-25). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09958-3
Kocaman, B. (2022). Development of an analytical thinking based online STEM curriculum and investigation of its efficiency [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Afyon Kocatepe]. Afyon Kocatepe University Digital Archive. https://l24.im/03vNQ
Lee, I., Martin, F., & Apone, K. (2014). Integrating computational thinking across the K--8 curriculum. Acm Inroads, 5(4), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1145/2684721.2684736
Lye, S. Y., & Koh, J. H. L. (2014). Review on teaching and learning of computational thinking through programming: What is next for K-12. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.012
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications
Ministry of National Education. (2021). Bilgisayar programlama ve robotik kodlama eğitimi kurs programları [Computer programming and robotic coding training course programs]. https://bit.ly/3IrzEUC
Nouri, J., Zhang, L., Mannila, L., & Norén, E. (2020). Development of computational thinking, digital competence and 21st century skills when learning programming in K-9. Education Inquiry, 11(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2019.1627844
Oluk, A., Korkmaz, Ö., & Oluk, H. (2018). Scratch’ın 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin algoritma geliştirme ve bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerilerine etkisi [Algorithm development and development of scratch's 5th grade students effect on computational thinking skills]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education/ Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(1), 54-71. https://bit.ly/3HlmtUb
Özçelik, A., & Akgündüz, D. (2018). Üstün/özel yetenekli öğrencilerle yapılan okul dışı STEM eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of gifted/talented students’ out-of-school STEM education]. Trakya Journal of Education, 8(2), 334-351. https://doi.org/10.24315/trkefd.331579
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2018). Assessment: A 21st century skills ımplementation guide. https://bit.ly/3CrLI4t
Popat, S., & Starkey, L. (2019). Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review. Computers & Education, 128, 365-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005
Rodríguez-Martínez, J. A., González-Calero, J. A., & Sáez-López, J. M. (2020). Computational thinking and mathematics using Scratch: An experiment with sixth-grade students. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(3), 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1612448
Saeli, M., Perrenet, J., Jochems, W. M. G., & Zwaneveld, B. (2011). Teaching programming in secondary school: A pedagogical content knowledge perspective. Informatics in Education, 10(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2011.06
Sáez-López, J. M., Román-González, M., & Vázquez-Cano, E. (2016). Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school: A two year case study using “Scratch” in five schools. Computers & Education, 97, 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.003
Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Yeni bir 21. yüzyıl becerisi olarak kodlama eğitimi ve kodlamanın eğitim politikalarına etkisi [Coding education as a new 21st century skill and its effect on educational policies]. In 18. Akademik Bilişim Kanferansı Bildiriler Kitabı [Proceedings of the 18th Academic Informatics Conference] (pp. 780-786). Adnan Menderes University.
Schroth, S. T., Daniels, J., & McCormick, K. (2019). Altered carbon: How parents can encourage and support gifted children's interest in STEM with readily available tools and apps. Parenting for High Potential, 8(1), 15-17. https://bit.ly/3WNlrFS
Shin, S., & Park, P. (2014). A study on the effect affecting problem solving ability of primary students through the scratch programming. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 59(1), 117-120.
Shin, S., Park, P., & Bae, Y. (2013). The effects of an ınformation-technology gifted program on friendship using scratch programming language and clutter. International Journal of Computer and Communication Engineering, 2(3), 246. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJCCE.2013.V2.181
Siegle, D. (2009). Developing student programming and problem-solving skills with Visual Basic. Gifted Child Today, 32(4), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/107621750903200408
Stemler, S., Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., & Sharpes, D. K. (2009). Using the theory of successful intelligence as a framework for developing assessments in AP Physics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.04.001
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Teaching for successful intelligence: Principles, practices, and outcomes. Educational and Child Psychology, 20, 6-18. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2003-06852-001
Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52(7), 700-712. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.7.700
Sternberg, R. J., Jarvin, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2010). Explorations in giftedness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778049
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. SAGE Publications.
Wang, H. Y., Huang, I., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of an integrated Scratch and project-based learning approach on the learning achievements of gifted students in computer courses. In K. Kita-ku (Ed.), 2014 IIAI 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics (pp. 382-387). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.85
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2017). Computational thinking’s influence on research and education for all. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(2), 7-14. https://bit.ly/3ZqgDbh
World Economic Forum. (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. WEF. https://bit.ly/3GHcMPt
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
Yıldız-Durak, H., & Güyer, T. (2019). An investigation of the opinions of gifted primary school students’ in the programming training processes. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 52(1), 107-137. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.466922