Ahmann, J. S., & Glock, M. D. (1971). Evaluating pupil growth: Principles of tests and measurement (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon Inc.

Akbaba, S. (2006). EÄŸitimde motivasyon [Motivation in education]. Kazım Karabekir Journal of Education Faculty/ Kazım Karabekir EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 343-361.

Aksoy, G. (2005). Fen eÄŸitiminde yaratıcı düsünme temelli bilimsel yöntem sürecinin öÄŸrenme ürünlerine etkisi [The Effect of the scientific method process, which is based on creative thinking, on the learning outcomes in science instruction] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Zonguldak Karaelmas University.

Anderson, L. W. (1988). Attitudes and their measurement, In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational research, methodology and measurement: An international hand-book. Pergamon.

AÅŸkar, P. (1986). Matematik dersine yönelik tutumu ölçen likert tipi bir ölçeÄŸin geliÅŸtirilmesi [Research of a Likert-type scale measuring attitude towards mathematics lesson]. Education and Science, 11(62), 31-36.

Bardak, Åž., & KaramustafaoÄŸlu, O. (2016). Yaratıcı düÅŸünme becerilerinin geliÅŸtirilmesi ile ilgili pedagojik alan bilgisinin tespiti [Determination of creative thinking about the development of pedagogical content knowledge skills]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching/ EÄŸitim ve ÖÄŸretim AraÅŸtırmaları Dergisi, 5(Special Issue 1), 227-237.

Baysan, C., & Tekarslan, E. (1998). Davranış bilimleri [Behavioral sciences]. İstanbul University Business Faculty.

Blosser, P. E. (1984). Attitude research in science education. Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED259941.pdf

Bolin, A.U., Khramtsova, I., & Saarnio, D., (2005). Using student journals to stimulate authentic learning: balancing bloom's cognitive and affective domains. Teaching of Psychology, 32(3), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15328023top3203_3

Büyüköztürk, Åž. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Manual of data analysis for social sciences] (14th ed.). PegemA.

Büyüköztürk, Åž., Çakmak, E.K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Åž., & Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel araÅŸtırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. PegemA

Candar, H. (2009). Fen eÄŸitiminde yaratıcı düÅŸünme öÄŸretim tekniklerinin öÄŸrencilerin akademik baÅŸarı, tutum ve motivasyonlarına etkisi [The effects of creative teaching techniques on students' academic achievement, attitude and motivation in science education [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Marmara University.

Cheng, V. M. Y. (2011). Enhancing creativity of elementary science teachers-a preliminary study. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 2(2), 1-23.

Combs, A. W. (1982). Affective education or none at all. Educational Leadership, 39(7), 495-497.

Comia, A.C.R. (2006). Creative movement: A powerful strategy to teach science [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Toronto University.

Çeliker, D., & Harman, G. (2015). The effect of the SCAMPER technique in raising awareness regarding the collection and utilization of solid waste. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 149-159.

Cermik, H., & Fenli-Aktan, A. (2020). Primary school students’ attitudes towards science. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(2), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.2.355

Demirci, C. (2007). Fen bilgisi öÄŸretiminde yaratıcılığın eriÅŸi ve tutuma etkisi [The effects of the creative approach in the science teaching on achievement and attitude]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education/ Hacettepe Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi Faculty, 32, 65-75.

Demirel, Ö. (2011). Kuramdan uygulamaya eÄŸitimde program geliÅŸtirme [Program development in education from theory to practice] (17th ed.). PegemA.

Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582-602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582

Erden, M., & Akman, Y. (2001). GeliÅŸim ve öÄŸrenme [Development and learning]. ArkadaÅŸ.

ErdoÄŸdu, M. Y. (2006). Yaratıcılık ile öÄŸretmen davranışları ve akademik baÅŸarı arasındaki iliÅŸkiler [Relationships between creativity, teacher behaviours and academic success]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences/ Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(17), 95-106.

Ekici, G. (2002). Biyoloji ÖÄŸretmenlerinin Laboratuar Dersine Yönelik Tutum ÖlçeÄŸi (BÖLDYTÖ) [The Attitude Scale of Biology Teachers toward Laboratory Lesson (ASBTTLL)]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty/ Hacettepe Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 62-66.

Geban, Ö., Ertepınar, H., Yılmaz, G., Atlan, A., & Åžahpaz, Ö. (1994, September 15-17). Bilgisayar destekli eÄŸitimin öÄŸrencilerin fen bilgisi baÅŸarılarına ve fen bilgisi ilgilerine etkisi [The effect of computer-assisted education on students' science achievement and science interest] [Paper Presentation]. I. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri EÄŸitimi Sempozyumu [I. National Science Education Symposium], Dokuz Eylül University, Ä°zmir, Turkey.

Gladding, S. T., & Henderson, D. A. (2000). Creativity and family counseling: The SCAMPER model as a template for promoting creative processes. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 8(3), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1066480700083005

Glenn, R. E. (1997). SCAMPER for student creativity. Education Digest, 62(6), 67-69.

GüneÅŸ, M. & KaraÅŸah, Åž. (2016). GeçmiÅŸten günümüze fen eÄŸitiminin önemi ve fen eÄŸitiminde son yıllarda yapılan çalışmalar [The studies in science education from the past to the present and the importance of science education]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching/ EÄŸitim ve ÖÄŸretim AraÅŸtırmaları Dergisi, 5(3), 122-136.

Hançer, A. H. (2007). Fen eÄŸitiminde yapılandırmacı yaklaşıma dayalı bilgisayar destekli öÄŸrenmenin kavram yanılgıları üzerine etkisi [The effect of computer assisted learning based on constructivist approach on misconceptions in science education]. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Social Sciences/ Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 31(1), 69-81.

Hoang, T. (2007). Creativity: A motivational tool for interest and conceptual understanding in science education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 209-215.

Ä°slim, Ö.F. (2009). Bilgi ve iletiÅŸim teknolojileri dersinin SCAMPER (yönlendirilmiÅŸ beyin fırtınası) tekniÄŸine göre iÅŸlenmesinin öÄŸrencilerin yaratıcı problem çözme becerilerine ve akademik baÅŸarılarına etkisi [The effects of scamper (directed brainstorming) technique on learners? creative problem solving and achievement in the information and communication technologies course] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University.

Jelena P., Apple C. Y., Toby M. Y., & Tong S. L. (2014). The feasibility of enhancement of knowledge and self-confidence in creativity: a plot study of a three-hour SCAMPER workshop on secondary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 32-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.006

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Prentice Hall.

KarataÅŸ, S., & Özcan, S. (2010). Yaratıcı düÅŸünme etkinliklerinin öÄŸrencilerin yaratıcı düÅŸünmelerine ve proje geliÅŸtirmelerine etkisi [The effects of creative thinking activities on learners’ creative thinking and project development skills]. Ahi Evran University Journal of KırÅŸehir Education Faculty/ Ahi Evran Üniversitesi KırÅŸehir EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 225-243.

KarataÅŸ, S., & Tonga, E. S. (2016). SCAMPER (yönlendirilmiÅŸ beyin fırtınası) tekniÄŸinin kullanımına yönelik öÄŸretmen adaylarının görüÅŸleri [For the use of the scamper (directed brain storm) technique opinions of teacher candidates]. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching/ EÄŸitim ve ÖÄŸretim AraÅŸtırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), 329-339.

Kind, P., Jones, K., & Barmby, P. (2007). Developing attitudes towards science measures. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 871–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600909091

Kocatepe, O. (2017). Ortaokul 6. sınıf fen bilimleri dersi bitki ve hayvanlarda üreme, büyüme ve geliÅŸme konusunda SCAMPER tekniÄŸinin akademik baÅŸarıya etkisi [Middle school 6th grade science course academic achievement of scamper technique on reproduction, growth and development in plants and animals] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. AÄŸrı Ä°brahim Çeçen University.

Kocayusuf, A. G. (2013). Ä°lköÄŸretim matematik eÄŸitiminde yaÅŸam temelli senaryolarla desteklenmiÅŸ tam öÄŸrenme stratejisinin öÄŸrencilerin öÄŸrenme ürünleri üzerine etkisi [The effects of learning products of context based scenario accompanied mastery learning strategy] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Akdeniz University.

Majid, D.A., Tan, A., & Soh, K. (2013). Enhancing children’s creativity: an exploratory study on using the ınternet and SCAMPER as creative writing tools. The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 13(2), 67-81.

Ministry of Education [MoE] (2017). Fen bilimleri dersi öÄŸretim programı [Science course curriculum]. Ministry of Education.

Morgan, C. T. (1995). Tutumlar ve önyargı [Attitudes and prejudice]. In S. KarakaÅŸ (Ed.), Psikolojiye giriÅŸ [Introduction to psychology] (pp.362-382). Hacettepe University Psychology Depertmant.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Öner, N. (1997). Türkiye’de kullanılan psikolojik testler [Psychological tests used in Turkey]. BoÄŸaziçi University.

Özaltay, N. (2020). YönlendirilmiÅŸ beyin fırtınası (SCAMPER) tekniÄŸinin fen bilgisi öÄŸretmen adaylarının yaratıcılıklarına ve materyal motivasyonlarına olan etkisinin incelenmesi [Examination of the effect of scamper technique on the creativity and material motivations of science preservice teachers] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Mersin University.

ÖzerbaÅŸ, M.A. (2011). Yaratıcı düÅŸünme öÄŸrenme ortamının akademik baÅŸarı ve bilgilerin kalıcılığa etkisi [The effect of creative thinking teaching environment on academic achievement and retention of knowledge]. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty/ Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31(3), 675-705.

Özkan, E.B., & Eryılmaz-MuÅŸtu, Ö. (2018). 8. Sınıf basit makineler ünitesine yönelik baÅŸari testi geliÅŸtirme: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Developing an achievement test for the unit of simple machines in the 8th grade curriculum: Validity and reliability study]. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute / Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(1), 737-754. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.332294

Poon, J. C. Y., Au, A. C. Y., Tong T. M. Y., & Lau, S. (2014). The feasibility of enhancement of knowledge and self-confidence in creativity: a pilot study of a three-hour SCAMPER workshop on secondary students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.006

Sayan, Y. (2010). Ä°lköÄŸretim dördüncü sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersi için geliÅŸtirilen materyallerin yaratıcı düÅŸünme becerisi, öz kavramı ve akademik baÅŸarı üzerindeki etkileri [The effects of the materials develeoped for the fourth grade science and technology course to the students’ skills of creative thinking, self-concept and academic achievement]. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylül University.

Shrigley, R.L., Kobala, T. R., & Simpson, R. D. (1988). Defining attitude for science educators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(8) 659-678. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660250805

Tican, C. (2019). Pre-service primary school and pre-school teachers’ perception of individual entrepreneurship and opinions about their creative thinking tendency. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 5(4), 591-606. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.5.4.591

Toraman, S., & Altun, S. (2013). Application of the six thinking hats and scamper techniques on the 7th grade course unit “human and environment”: An exemplary case study. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(4), 166-185.

Tuan, H.L., Chin, C.C., & Shieh, S.H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students’ motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 634-659. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737

Ülgen, G. (1997). EÄŸitim psikolojisi [Educational psychology]. Lazer.

Wayne, M. (2006). Creativity its place in education. Jeffry Baumgartner. https://cutt.ly/qkDKVLH

Wu, T. T., & Wu, Y. T. (2020). Applying project-based learning and SCAMPER teaching strategies in engineering education to explore the influence of creativity on cognition, personal motivation, and personality traits. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100631

YaÄŸcı, E. (2012). YönlendirilmiÅŸ beyin fırtınası tekniÄŸi: SCAMPER konusunda veli görüÅŸleri üzerine bir çalışma [A study on parents' opinions on directed brain storming tecnique: Scamper]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education Faculty/ Hacettepe Üniversitesi EÄŸitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 485-494.

Yıldız, V. (2003). Çocukların yaratıcılığını geliÅŸtirmede alternatif bir yol: SCAMPER [An alternative way to develop children's creativity: SCAMPER]. Children Monthly Mother Father Educator Magazine / Çoluk Çocuk Aylık Anne Baba EÄŸitimci Dergisi, 24(March), 16-19.

Yıldız, V., & Ä°srael, E. (2002). Yaratıcılığı geliÅŸtirmede bir yol: SCAMPER [A way to improve creativity: SCAMPER]. Journal of Education for Life/ YaÅŸadıkça EÄŸitim, 75, 53-55.

Yılmaz, H., & Huyugüzel-ÇavaÅŸ, P. (2007). Fen ÖÄŸrenimine Yönelik Motivasyon ÖlçeÄŸinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Reliability and validity study of the Students’ Motivation toward Science Learning (SMTSL) questionnaire]. Elementary Education Online/ Ä°lköÄŸretim Online, 6(3), 430-440.

YiÄŸitalp, N. (2014).YönlendirilmiÅŸ beyin fırtınası (SCAMPER) tekniÄŸine dayalı eÄŸitimin beÅŸ yaÅŸ çocuklarının problem çözme becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi [A study on the effects of the SCAMPER technique on five years old chidren's problem solving skills] [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University.